Live data from Hacker News

Australia's social media ban has failed

reuters.com

21–30 of 134 posts

Re: Australia's social media ban has failed

#21

The whole idea of excluding teenagers from social interactions because you can't police how shit people are is absurd.

Isn't that a mischaracterisation of the goal and the actual implementation? Avoiding social networks is restricting away from unhealthy spaces, not preventing social interactions per se.

Re: Australia's social media ban has failed

#22
post #10
post #2

Ban the hardware, not the software.

So, are you suggesting that the legal use of smartphones should be banned for anyone under the age of 18? What kind of society do you want to live in?

A smart phone is a human right, according to you? Of course you can ban them. The addicts will have to wean off, but after that, there's no disadvantage.

Re: Australia's social media ban has failed

#24
post #7
post #4

The fact that they'll ban kids from accessing every social media except Reddit tells you everything you need to know about the real motives behind this "ban".

I'm not on social media. But reddit seems slightly more intelligent than tiktok, instagram, X. What's the real motive then, according to you?

Reddit is also a dedicated porn website.

Re: Australia's social media ban has failed

#25
post #22
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So, are you suggesting that the legal use of smartphones should be banned for anyone under the age of 18? What kind of society do you want to live in?

A smart phone is a human right, according to you? Of course you can ban them. The addicts will have to wean off, but after that, there's no disadvantage.

Considering it's how many people engage in speech, yes.

Re: Australia's social media ban has failed

#26
post #2

Ban the hardware, not the software.

100% agreed. Restricting possession of physical items is less tyrannical than restricting communication. Social media is only harmful when it's ubiquitous and inescapable. When you have to make a conscious effort to "go on the computer", and when there are significant opportunity costs to doing so, you naturally put it into its proper perspective.

Re: Australia's social media ban has failed

#28
post #22
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So, are you suggesting that the legal use of smartphones should be banned for anyone under the age of 18? What kind of society do you want to live in?

A smart phone is a human right, according to you? Of course you can ban them. The addicts will have to wean off, but after that, there's no disadvantage.

I think it is a human right that I decide for myself what is good for me and what is bad for me. I have for example Instagram and Facebook, but only to look what kind of Magic the Gathering Events are at the weekend, do I look at reels and doom scroll? No. So I would not say I am addicted despite having a smartphone.

Technology is in most of the cases not bad, and their use can enrich lives.

Re: Australia's social media ban has failed

#29

The whole idea of excluding teenagers from social interactions because you can't police how shit people are is absurd.

That is such a dishonest representation of the ban that I think that even the majority of people that’re against it would admit that it’s BS.

Re: Australia's social media ban has failed

#30

It has been banned for a few months. Hardly a failure. It will be a failure if 10 year olds continue to join social media at the rate they have done so in the past. It’s not likely to get 15 year olds who have been addicted for 5 years off it, anymore than smoking bans have any impact on teens who have been smoking or vaping for years.

There is some effect however. Many kids including mine used to have there first phone around their 10th birthday. Now I see parents around me waiting longer due to the ban.

Sure if you are 15 you can get a phone yourself, but for younger kids the ban has a positive effect.

Post reply on HN