Live data from Hacker News

Atom is better than RSS, in ways that matter

chrismorgan.info

11–20 of 111 posts

Re: Atom is better than RSS, in ways that matter

#11
I remember ( I may be very wrong ) eventually RSS and Atom became one and the same thing for consumer and that all RSS reader would parse Atom feed, RSS became the logo and the name people know, atom was used behind the scene.

Apart from iTunes, as the article said.

It has been 20+ years I do hope someone on HN can now spills the beans as to why.

Re: Atom is better than RSS, in ways that matter

#12
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What? Not at all. RSS is a product category. Many RSS feeds are, if you look into them, Atom. Your RSS reader just doesn't bother to tell you, because why would you care? Try putting a Betamax tape into a VHS VCR and see if you can watch it.

Atom is a response to not wanting to support backwards compatibility like RSS does in order to improve things. https://web.archive.org/web/20080216234454/http://www.sixapa... It's explicitly a different thing. This is like pointing at the monitor of a desktop computer and saying, "that's the computer". It is effective to communicate with people who aren't interested in computers, but it's also not true and the distin…

> and the early popularity and widespread adoption of RSS, the better format (atom) isn't used nearly as much.

That may have been true 20 years ago, but now that pretty much no-one uses either of them , I'd be surprised if RSS was still meaningfully more widespread than Atom. (Except everything is being called RSS).

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49141336 is the only valid response to your VHS/Betamax comparison, really.

Re: Atom is better than RSS, in ways that matter

#13
post #12
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Atom is a response to not wanting to support backwards compatibility like RSS does in order to improve things. https://web.archive.org/web/20080216234454/http://www.sixapa... It's explicitly a different thing. This is like pointing at the monitor of a desktop computer and saying, "that's the computer". It is effective to communicate with people who aren't interested in computers, but it's also not true and the distin…

> and the early popularity and widespread adoption of RSS, the better format (atom) isn't used nearly as much. That may have been true 20 years ago, but now that pretty much no-one uses either of them , I'd be surprised if RSS was still meaningfully more widespread than Atom. (Except everything is being called RSS). https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49141336 is the only valid response to your VHS/Betamax compariso…

I use RSS multiple times daily.

Re: Atom is better than RSS, in ways that matter

#14
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> and the early popularity and widespread adoption of RSS, the better format (atom) isn't used nearly as much. That may have been true 20 years ago, but now that pretty much no-one uses either of them , I'd be surprised if RSS was still meaningfully more widespread than Atom. (Except everything is being called RSS). https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49141336 is the only valid response to your VHS/Betamax compariso…

I use RSS multiple times daily.

And you're also on HN, you're not exactly the average human being.

Do you use “RSS” as a protol specifically, or do you use “RSS” as in “any feed no matter the protocol”?

Re: Atom is better than RSS, in ways that matter

#15
post #11

I remember ( I may be very wrong ) eventually RSS and Atom became one and the same thing for consumer and that all RSS reader would parse Atom feed, RSS became the logo and the name people know, atom was used behind the scene. Apart from iTunes, as the article said. It has been 20+ years I do hope someone on HN can now spills the beans as to why.

I think literally 90% of people that know RSS, if you ask them what Atom is, they will probably reply RSS.

I liked thought the article as I never deep dived in the differences

Re: Atom is better than RSS, in ways that matter

#16
Most of the online content I consume comes to me either via RSS or Atom (I don't have numbers on the split). Not once have I thought - "Gosh darn it, this blog uses RSS instead of Atom, even though Atom is so obviously the better choice. Now I don't even want to add this blog to my feed." ...

Re: Atom is better than RSS, in ways that matter

#18

Most of the online content I consume comes to me either via RSS or Atom (I don't have numbers on the split). Not once have I thought - "Gosh darn it, this blog uses RSS instead of Atom, even though Atom is so obviously the better choice. Now I don't even want to add this blog to my feed." ...

I don't think this article is aimed at consumers, but at developers who might have to write parsers, or people who are trying to decide what feed format to use for their own content.

Though you might be upset about RSS being used when your reader screws up with it, because some things are difficult to interpret. Of course, you won't know why it screws up, and you'll probably blame the person who wrote the feed, not the format itself.

Re: Atom is better than RSS, in ways that matter

#19
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> and the early popularity and widespread adoption of RSS, the better format (atom) isn't used nearly as much. That may have been true 20 years ago, but now that pretty much no-one uses either of them , I'd be surprised if RSS was still meaningfully more widespread than Atom. (Except everything is being called RSS). https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49141336 is the only valid response to your VHS/Betamax compariso…

I use RSS multiple times daily.

One person using something doesn't mean it's popular.

Re: Atom is better than RSS, in ways that matter

#20
post #2

Atom is better than RSS in the way Betamax was better than VHS. With the same outcome and consequences for practical use.

Not relevant to the overall discussion, but this VHS vs Betamax thing is actually a myth, borne from confusing Betamax (a home consumer version, comparable and inferior to VHS) with Betacam (a professional format, which could use the same physical tapes as Betamax, albeit at much shorter runtimes so not suitable for movies).
Post reply on HN