Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're making my point with your rebuttal. A lot of people think different about right and wrong, good and evil, than I or you do, and that's because they look towards different sources. I'll assume you think cutting the hands off someone who stole something from you is wrong. But some other people think it's the right thing to do. What? Are you simply morally superior to them? Or is it that you've received from othe…
> Long ago slavery was globally mainstream and accepted until 'some weirdos' pointed to the Bible and said 'Hey, maybe slavery is wrong, according to this we're all created equal under God so we should not hold slaves'. Bible does NOT directly condemn slavery. Kind of worse than that, in the Old Testament it accepts it and puts out rules on how slaves are to be treated. The statement that Christianity is directly res…
I politely invite you to do your own research, so you don't have to take my word for it.
> What's right or wrong doesn't change one bit depending on what other people think or what some random book says.
So you do acknowledge an absolute of good and evil, right and wrong. Good. We got somewhere.
In regards to the rest, you're drastically limited by your ignorance and misunderstanding of basic Christian concepts, most probably conditioned by your radical prejudices and already formed opinions.
This conversation has become absurd in the sense that you're trying to convince me, a Christian, about what motivates me, or moves me, or about my understanding of reality and absolutes.
Keep your prejudices, you're free to decide, and you're responsible of your decisions.
You still haven't directly answered my question.
Have a good one.