Tell HN: I hate your fuzzy search
11–20 of 64 posts
Re: Tell HN: I hate your fuzzy search
#12For example search for "Amerca" with and without quotes. Without quotes you get content for "America" but with quotes you only get the exact typo match.
Re: Tell HN: I hate your fuzzy search
#13Gmail's search on mobile, where things come up in the quick results only to disappear when I complete the search, is a millstone about my neck.
Re: Tell HN: I hate your fuzzy search
#14Re: Tell HN: I hate your fuzzy search
#15https://gist.github.com/hundredwatt/183191d02f1fe0db31c3e910...
Re: Tell HN: I hate your fuzzy search
#16Even when an ad exists with EXACT obscure model I'm looking for... It spits out pages of unrelated or semi related garbage before it may or may not show me what I'm actually looking for :-(
Quotes, slashes, nothing seems to work. So I'm with you! Sometimes I just want an exact literal search.
Re: Tell HN: I hate your fuzzy search
#17Spotify's fuzzy search makes me want to do pirating again. Looking for a non mainstream artist can be really hard at times for no good reason than to appeal to the dumb average user. I even tried to build my own spotify player and going over the API - same shit (allmost).
Re: Tell HN: I hate your fuzzy search
#18Gmail's search on mobile, where things come up in the quick results only to disappear when I complete the search, is a millstone about my neck.
Re: Tell HN: I hate your fuzzy search
#19I'm thinking that double-quotes does, indeed, force an exact search.
But fuzzy searches can be extremely useful. Most folks are "fuzzy."
Google built a pretty huge empire, on simple, fuzzy search.
Re: Tell HN: I hate your fuzzy search
#20I'd say close to 90% of my daily searches could be served with exact matching. The next 8-9% could be solved by a little more deterministic sophistication (e.g., edit distance, equivalence classes for synonyms). Then the last 1-2% is when I really need some fuzzy magic; mostly to give me an idea what to do with obscure programming-related problems.