Is it more profitable to lease the space for banners as opposed to lease the apartments to tenants?
The tiny holdout building in the middle of Macy’s is back in view
21–30 of 73 posts
Re: The tiny holdout building in the middle of Macy’s is back in view
#22That building looks horrible, do people live there?
Re: The tiny holdout building in the middle of Macy’s is back in view
#23Re: The tiny holdout building in the middle of Macy’s is back in view
#24Re: The tiny holdout building in the middle of Macy’s is back in view
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are several such buildings in NYC in prime real estate areas that are kept empty in order to prioritize billboard revenue.
Source? My understanding is this is no longer true
Some other buildings in Times Square keep several floors empty to use for signage instead, a minimum of which is actually mandated by the city.
Re: The tiny holdout building in the middle of Macy’s is back in view
#26Is it more profitable to lease the space for banners as opposed to lease the apartments to tenants?
Land value tax solves this
Re: The tiny holdout building in the middle of Macy’s is back in view
#27Is it more profitable to lease the space for banners as opposed to lease the apartments to tenants?
Re: The tiny holdout building in the middle of Macy’s is back in view
#28a farm. in manhattan sigh
Do you think Manhattan has always been skyscrapers?
Re: The tiny holdout building in the middle of Macy’s is back in view
#29Re: The tiny holdout building in the middle of Macy’s is back in view
#30Is it more profitable to lease the space for banners as opposed to lease the apartments to tenants?
Land value tax solves this