Live data from Hacker News

Software for One

ajwaxman.com

131–140 of 301 posts

Re: Software for One

#131
I joked a while back that it was faster to vibe-code a white noise generator than to download a white-noise app.

I've since tested that theory on the Google Play Store (iOS has one built in), and it was depressingly true. The slow part was trying to find an app that didn't waste your time with ads.

Re: Software for One

#132
post #97

Writing code with real use is very different from writing code for the sake of writing (looks cool, sounds cool). Writing code with one user is the base case of a “why am I writing this” recursion - because I use it. Every action leads to next insight. For me, a browser extension that provides a table of content to chat interfaces because I always need to scroll up and down to read preview queries. Writing browser ex…

Especially when the primary motivation is not specifically monetization I find that I'm less likely to be discouraged when an action leads to an uncomfortable insight of "no one else would use this"

Re: Software for One

#133
post #12
post #2

This is such a romantic idea, but unfortunately Apple and Google are hostile to this model. Of the two, iOS is /worst/ for running vibe coded apps. You need to pay $99 a year to be an Apple developer if you want your app to live on your phone for more than a a week. Distribution is a also pain in the ass even for personal use alone (you can't just toss around an IPA). Finally, so many useful APIs are totally locked u…

> You need to pay $99 a year to be an Apple developer if you want your app to live on your phone for more than a a week. No complaints over paying more than >$100 a month in subscriptions with coding agents but $99 a year is some how too much? Yet another reason why “developers” are just consumers that are selective complainers that want their tools to cost $0.00. Clearly as already stated in the article, hosting and…

Not a matter of money. It's an outright rejection of the "Billionaire-in-the-middle" model that has been eroding the traditional personal computing ownership model.

Just discovered webxdc in another comment here! https://delta.chat/en/2025-01-23-webxdc-no-billionaires

Re: Software for One

#134
post #15

Things I've built in the last month or so: * A personal music player for Apple Music with an embedded agent loop, so I can say things like "I'm going to work in the wood shop, play woodworking-appropriate music and keep the playlist full and non-repeating indefinitely". * A calorie/protein tracker that takes 1-liner summaries of meals, resolves them to macros with GPT5 calls, and tracks them in SQLite. * A macOS menu…

As a new father, just using so many apps sounds exhausting, let alone building and maintaining them. I would have been very excited about these maybe 10-15 years ago. Now I just want the ability to do things with my phone when my hands are tied up holding the baby.

Re: Software for One

#135
post #88
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've been living in scandinavia for several years and I've never seen this happen in person. Just on reddit and now here. I kinda doubt it's something widespread.

Around here (Northern Jutland, Danmark) this is the norm. But do doubt away. :) Please see the official guidelines: https://www.sst.dk/vidensbase/graviditet-og-smaaboern/barnet...

Perhaps just say "here in northern jutland" next time?

Re: Software for One

#136
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Things like this are easy with a simple agent loop. To be fair, they’re also easy (trivial, even) without one. It’s not like “play more music like this” is something we ever needed AI for.

> It’s not like “play more music like this” is something we ever needed AI for. Borderline off-topic, but I love how fast the goal post moves. A decade or two ago "Similar music to this" was definitively in the realm of AI/ML, now it's some full-stack dev's afternoon to implement.

[deleted]

Re: Software for One

#137

In my line of work, we convert words to numbers, and we have a codex that defines meanings for the numbers; that way, we can write publicly but (in making sure we choose words that, when converted to numbers, convert to numbers that have the second meaning we want) our public writing will only be understood on this second level with this second meaning only by those who use this system and codex. It's something like…

What?

Re: Software for One

#138

Thariq wrote "personal software was a bit early in 2020 but in 2026, it really can be as personal as a home cooked meal, or a handwritten letter." Excuse me??? Vibe-coding personal software is not a homecooked meal or a handwritten letter! It is [at best!] more akin to tastefully combining microwaved ramen with microwaved veggies and toaster oven chicken, or using ChatGPT to write a letter then editing it afterwards.…

If someone spends an hour in the kitchen making you food, and they choose to use the microwave to heat up the veggies because it's healthier than boiling them on the stove, that's devaluing the human experience? What's more human than listening to another person's problems and then making something to help them with that problem? It could be a chair or a meal, or now, a bit of software.

Re: Software for One

#139
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> A personal music player for Apple Music with an embedded agent loop, so I can say things like "I'm going to work in the wood shop, play woodworking-appropriate music and keep the playlist full and non-repeating indefinitely". how is AI (or a human for that matter) supposed to know what “woodworking-appropriate music is”? I had the same thoughts when spotify released their “let AI make a playlist for you”. Like, we…

> how is AI (or a human for that matter) supposed to know what “woodworking-appropriate music is”? It doesn't, but you'll believe it is because that's what you asked for. It's not like you have a solid test for what it is yourself

Guaranteed it would be unable to avoid searching for and selecting songs that specifically mention wood, woodworking, the shop, etc. It's like when you tell it to write something and give it a "vibe" or "mood" word wishing it could just give tone to the generated text, but instead it incorporates it literally.

Re: Software for One

#140
post #30

Side note, why not just deploy onto a VPS and save the money from using hosted services, as well as protecting yourself from when they inevitably go down? The CBA clearly shows that while active development is going on its trivial to have hosted service subscriptions because the AI sub is way more, but what if that sub disappears? You're left paying (relatively) exorbitant amounts compared to $1-10 per month per VPS…

Almost $2000 a year is beyond ridiculous and would make me question the author's ability to write software on his own (but I'd get downvoted for insulting him or not realizing some kind of time savings they help with).

I spend $2/month on my VPS, write my code in HTML/CSS/Javascript with Posgresql along with other Unix (FreeBSD) tools and the standard languages and get similar things done.

Post reply on HN