Live data from Hacker News

BMW Spider-Man in-car advertising

consumerrights.wiki

131–140 of 173 posts

Re: BMW Spider-Man in-car advertising

#131
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The "lane assist" is very dangerous. I don't understand how this got in cars to begin with, nevermind become mandatory. It's super "fun" with temporary marking around road works. I bet it works perfectly in a lab but in the real world..

I've never had a point where it is dangerous. It vibrates the steering wheel and that's it. Even on the autobahn's 2.20m wide roadwork left lanes it works good/not bad enough I just leave it on. Lane keeping is not mandatory, only a warning system.

I had lane keeping “assist” in a Subaru Forrester rental car almost kill me and my family by trying to push us into the path of a very large truck last year.

Re: BMW Spider-Man in-car advertising

#132
post #107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

(I checked the directives weeks ago.) In the eu, the general idea is "you can disable the functions each time you restart the car - they will be re-enabled as the car is off". Some people spend minutes turning off the annoying parts from the settings before starting the car, each time.

It’s the main thing they tell you when you buy a new car. Press here 4 times, then here 3 times, then here once, and you’re good.

No single mamdani-burton to unsubscribe?

Re: BMW Spider-Man in-car advertising

#133
post #89
post #58

this is what you get for buying cheap noname brand car from Temu similar thing happened with that British LGBT brand, which is gone though it's clear people who buy BMW are not mentally sane anyway, I'm yet to see BMW driver with stable personality who would not vent their mental issues on the road, these people will buy BMW with literally any design and specs just because it's BMW, no matter it looks like ugly tank…

Seriously not helpful, and have you actually matched this opinion to the statistics which are freely available?

yes, these are data from Czechia in 2022, TOP10 (it's percentage share of accidents per operated/registered cars, it doesn't take into consideration km travelled though which would eliminate all the trucks immediately with their yearly mileage):

1. DAF 4,67%

2. MAN 3,60%

3. Iveco 2,99%

4. Mercedes-Benz 1,53%

5. Volvo 1,34%

6. BMW 1,04%

7. Audi 1,02%

8. Fiat 0,89%

9. Renault 0,86%

10. Volkswagen 0,83%

Guess which of these brands doesn't sell trucks (just a little bit hint - Mercedes and Volvo sell a lot of trucks in Europe) and you will get number one among passenger cars from one brand which doesn't sell trucks and cause the most accidents followed unsurprisingly by Audi.

https://www.garaz.cz/clanek/servis-auto-cisla-statistiky-vin...

different chart from 2025 from CEBIA in Czechia, company checking whether car was crashed and their findings, percentage of cars they were checking and which actually crashed, though this one just says percentage out of verified cars, it must be noted that Skoda/Toyota are extremely popular in Czechia, so they are also more likely to have accidents:

Audi 69,69 %

BMW 68,82 %

Škoda 64,37 %

Toyota 63,87 %

Mercedes-Benz 62,27 %

Hyundai 61,95 %

Volvo 58,59 %

Volkswagen 56,02 %

Seat 55,02 %

Mazda 54,78 %

https://autosalon.tv/novinky/ojetiny/10-nejcasteji-bourajici...

Re: BMW Spider-Man in-car advertising

#134
post #120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The infotainment thing is regrettable but nowhere near as bad as the cellular modems phoning home, constantly spying, possibly raising your insurance rates… Lucky for Big Brother they’ve blanketed this country (USA) in Flock cameras. New car, old car, they’re ready to pull over journalists in dealer loaners, people in the wrong place at the wrong time…

What stops your navigation app on phone collecting all the data anyways and sharing it with insurance corps?

The phone app misses lots of data the car can collent and send. When, how frequently, and how long turn indicators are used. How aggressively the throttle and brake are applied, how frequently pre-tensioners and other safety features activate, how closely the radar or lidar-equipped cruise control sees you following others, and I'm sure lots I haven't thought of

Re: BMW Spider-Man in-car advertising

#135
post #123
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mercs and BMWs occupy the same market space. They are direct competitors. Mercedes may have a car or two that reaches just out of upper middle class but they are largely a middle to upper middle class brand, just like BMW. The fact that Merc would do it too just means they are both happy cheapening their brand to align with practices of cheap off-brand android TVs.

Mercedes is famously a company with the widest range of models, from entry-level budget cars to high-end luxury ones. It's basically their MO.

That describes almost every major auto company though. Some companies sell their luxury lines through different badging or different branding but it's the same line up. Even Nissan has a luxury line. If you want a 500k BMW you can do that too.

Re: BMW Spider-Man in-car advertising

#137
post #62

It sounds awful, but it might not even make the top-5 of the most annoying/concering things you'll get in a new car (bought in the EU at least), many of which are now mandatory by regulation. What you'll also get is a camera that tracks your eye movements to play an alert when they're not on the road, an alarm when you drive over the allowed speed limit as determined by a camera, an alarm plus a mechanical yanking of…

Those things are at least well intentioned, and honestly the lane keeping has once or twice saved me from accidentally leaving my lane when distracted, which might have saved my life.

An ad for a spiderman movie has no upside and is another small step towards a Minority Report vision of the future.

Re: BMW Spider-Man in-car advertising

#139
post #14

Great way to tank a brand. Part of BMW's value is/was the expectation of an upper middle class snob driving it, but having your car force ads on you is something people wouldn't even expect from a Kia Soul leased off a used lot.

> Part of BMW's value is/was the expectation of an upper middle class snob driving it BMWs are no where near for that "class". A Mercedes-Benz is for that and even they also put ads in their own dashboard screens. [0] So on HN-land, time to rule out BMWs, Chevrolets, Mercedes-Benz, Teslas, Volkswagens, Kias. What else? [0] https://www.motor1.com/news/797846/mercedes-screen-plays-ads...

Mercedes used to be that. The S class used to be the best car you could buy.

The S class sales are tanking as well as E class and the rest of their cars are just toyota corolla class with extra "luxury" features.

AMG used to actually mean something, now AMG badging is a feature that means nothing (Like M cars).

Re: BMW Spider-Man in-car advertising

#140
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They're also really nice to drive (at least when they work).

Only the older ones without screens. A naturally aspirated inline 6 with a manual gearbox and 50/50 weight distribution is it's own special kind of bliss. I only take it out maybe 20 times per year, but after merely 30s behind the wheel I remember why I keep it.

The B58 engine + ZF8 is probably one of the best engine/transmission combos BMW ever built. And arguably one of the best combos on the road today.

Very reliable, efficient and fast. It's all the other things that break.

Post reply on HN