Live data from Hacker News

EU now fears US interference in European elections

eunews.it

61–62 of 62 posts

Re: EU now fears US interference in European elections

#61
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> You can't imagine any situation where the people are seeing this for themselves? I am not sure you understand how this works. If you are bombarded with a barrage of fear-mongering content then overtime you are conditioned to interpret even very mundane and innocuous events as being danger signals. Such as LGBT individuals being a threat when going to the toilet or the mere existence of immigrants from specific part…

[flagged]

> It's clear by reading all this that you are arguing against some boogieman you've made up in your head because I didn't say any of those things.

Your cognitive dissonance is fantastic. Here you are mindlessly advocating alt right pipeline talking points on how outsiders and minorities are the problem, and then accusing others of arguing against "boogieman" when this fact is pointed to you.

But let's pretend that Haitians are eating your pets, random Mexicans are stealing your tech jobs, and trans people are terrorizing bathrooms. Those are the real problems. That's what you see with your own very eyes on Facebook and Instagram, ain't it?

Re: EU now fears US interference in European elections

#62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I think the first part of this is political alignment right? No, no it's not a mere misalignment. Opposing fascism supported on dehumanizing policies such as racial supremacy is not a mere difference in opinion, as is pushes to invade and annex other countries. WW2 wasn't fought because people happened to disagree. The problem with Nazi Germany and imperial Japan was not a whimsical difference of opinion. Let's not…

> Opposing fascism supported on dehumanizing policies such as racial supremacy is not a mere difference in opinion, as is pushes to invade and annex other countries. I'm not sure, I'd say two things: - I think "mere difference of opinion" suggests disagreements can't be on serious issues, as if there's something trivial about "x things racism is acceptable a y doesn't". I don't know that I'd agree? Differences in opi…

> Differences in opinion can be on major issues and are important.

Invading Greenland, annexing Canada, and helping Russia invade half a dozen neighboring nations while waging economic war on Europe in the form of tariffs is far from mere "differences of opinion".

Post reply on HN