Run Kimi K3 using 29 GB of RAM at 0.50 tok/s
1–10 of 181 posts
Re: Run Kimi K3 using 29 GB of RAM at 0.50 tok/s
#2Does it not use Metal, on macOS? Would it be faster if it did?
Re: Run Kimi K3 using 29 GB of RAM at 0.50 tok/s
#3[deleted]
Re: Run Kimi K3 using 29 GB of RAM at 0.50 tok/s
#4That README hits all my “this is authored by an LLM” instincts. I presume the codebase is also written by an LLM?
Re: Run Kimi K3 using 29 GB of RAM at 0.50 tok/s
#5Does it not use Metal, on macOS? Would it be faster if it did?
[dead]
Re: Run Kimi K3 using 29 GB of RAM at 0.50 tok/s
#6That README hits all my “this is authored by an LLM” instincts. I presume the codebase is also written by an LLM?
>Contributors
>...
>claude
You don't need to presume. If someone is so lazy that they tell claude to commit their code (ie. they're too lazy to run git commit themselves), the chances they reviewed the code is slim.
Re: Run Kimi K3 using 29 GB of RAM at 0.50 tok/s
#7That README hits all my “this is authored by an LLM” instincts. I presume the codebase is also written by an LLM?
>Contributors >... >claude You don't need to presume. If someone is so lazy that they tell claude to commit their code (ie. they're too lazy to run git commit themselves), the chances they reviewed the code is slim.
Why do you say lazy? maybe they are ok with people seeing it is claude?
Re: Run Kimi K3 using 29 GB of RAM at 0.50 tok/s
#8That README hits all my “this is authored by an LLM” instincts. I presume the codebase is also written by an LLM?
>Contributors >... >claude You don't need to presume. If someone is so lazy that they tell claude to commit their code (ie. they're too lazy to run git commit themselves), the chances they reviewed the code is slim.
To be fair, I appreciate when they are so upfront about who wrote the code without requiring further heuristics, so I encourage this behavior.
Re: Run Kimi K3 using 29 GB of RAM at 0.50 tok/s
#9That README hits all my “this is authored by an LLM” instincts. I presume the codebase is also written by an LLM?
>Contributors >... >claude You don't need to presume. If someone is so lazy that they tell claude to commit their code (ie. they're too lazy to run git commit themselves), the chances they reviewed the code is slim.
Honestly, Claude writes better commit messages than most people.
Personally I've mostly given in to letting it commit for me now, though I do occasionally take over and hand-write the messages if it's a particularly important concept and Claude's is too verbose.
Codex/GPT-x defaults to one-line commit messages, which are too short. Claude likes to write several paragraphs, which is usually too long.
If you tell it how to commit properly once per session it will stick with your standards for the rest of that session, and you can put that in AGENTS.md if you can be bothered to.
Re: Run Kimi K3 using 29 GB of RAM at 0.50 tok/s
#10Where can this 1tb k3.waste be downloaded?