Where .env Went Wrong
secretspec.dev
Where .env Went Wrong
1–10 of 77 posts
Re: Where .env Went Wrong
#2Re: Where .env Went Wrong
#3Re: Where .env Went Wrong
#4I use Pydantic Settings for this, would be nice to see a comparison to that. I do like the idea of keeping this in a configuration file.
Re: Where .env Went Wrong
#5I use Pydantic Settings for this, would be nice to see a comparison to that. I do like the idea of keeping this in a configuration file.
- Secrets don't belong in config https://secretspec.dev/blog/secrets-dont-belong-in-config/
- You want to have flexibility of choosing between any secrets provider: https://secretspec.dev/blog/but-i-use-sops/
Re: Where .env Went Wrong
#6Re: Where .env Went Wrong
#7A big difference between our tool and many other similar tools is that we combine the schema and value setting into one surface, with a way of merging many definitions together, much like cuelang - but in a way that feels more intuitive. It's extremely flexible, and can even do credential brokering for untrusted workloads.
I've been enjoying the secretspec content lately, and watching it evolve :)
Re: Where .env Went Wrong
#8Re: Where .env Went Wrong
#9Claude, find a key underpinning of most development workflows, then make a product to disrupt (and eventually SaaSify/enshitify) it. Finally, write a convincing ad disguised blog post, and purchase a fancy domain. Here's my credit card.
Re: Where .env Went Wrong
#10(Am I getting thrown out the window now? :)