Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Superlogical

superlogical.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

291–300 of 504 posts

Re: Superlogical

#291

Post by theturtletalks »

brandall10 wrote: post #120

This sounds like a mashup of of several things I've been playing with lately... - pi-web ( https://pi-web.dev/ ): a web frontend for the Pi coding harness which can multiplex pi sessions across multiple machines - herdr ( https://herdr.dev/ ): a fairly polished agentic multiplexer TUI, can easily spawn or destroy windows based on subagent activity - firstmate ( https://github.com/kunchenguid/firstmate ): a meta envir…

I’m tracking them all here[0]

The first app in this space was VibeTunnel[1]. It basically lets you start terminals on your Mac and the web app allows you to control these terminals on your iPhone using Tailscale. In the end, it’s just terminals on the web with organization around it.

I forked VibeTunnel and turned it into a Next app and added workspaces with memory and turned it into a software factory which is making open-source alternatives for me while I sleep. I call it VibeGhost and will be launching it soon[2].

0. https://opensource.builders/alternatives/conductor

1. https://github.com/amantus-ai/vibetunnel

2. https://www.vibeghost.org

Re: Superlogical

#292

Post by otterley »

throwaway-blaze wrote: post #74
jawngee wrote: post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He thinks ability to vote (and the number of votes you get) should be based on income. https://vancouverisland.ctvnews.ca/business/article/shopify-...

Maybe worth mentioning that the founding fathers in the US believed only property owners should vote.

They also didn't forbid slavery. It doesn't mean they were right.

Re: Superlogical

#293

Post by dragonwriter »

throwaway-blaze wrote: post #74
jawngee wrote: post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He thinks ability to vote (and the number of votes you get) should be based on income. https://vancouverisland.ctvnews.ca/business/article/shopify-...

Maybe worth mentioning that the founding fathers in the US believed only property owners should vote.

The founding fathers, the framers (a different and later group, though the two overlap and are often conflated) and original states had a variety of (and evolving in some cases between the Founding and the Constitution) opinions on the issue; some (Thomas Paine and Ben Franklin, notably, the latter also the primary author of PA’s 1776 Constitution which also adopted this position at the state level) were in favor of universal male suffrage.

Re: Superlogical

#294

Post by dragonwriter »

Yokohiii wrote: post #274
throwaway-blaze wrote: post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe worth mentioning that the founding fathers in the US believed only property owners should vote.

Franklin also practiced air bathing instead of hygiene.

Franklin also supported universal male suffrage, wrote Pennsulvania’s 1776 constitution which adopted universal male suffrage, and condemned property requirements for the franchise, reportedly arguing:

“Today a man owns a jackass worth fifty dollars, and he is entitled to vote; but before the next election the jackass dies. The man in the meantime has become more experienced, his knowledge of the principles of government, and his acquaintance with mankind, are more extensive, and he is therefore better qualified to make a proper selection of rulers — but the jackass is dead and the man cannot vote. Now gentlemen, pray inform me, in whom is the right of suffrage? In the man or in the jackass.”

Re: Superlogical

#295

Post by dragonwriter »

otterley wrote: post #292
throwaway-blaze wrote: post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe worth mentioning that the founding fathers in the US believed only property owners should vote.

They also didn't forbid slavery. It doesn't mean they were right.

“Didn’t forbid”, if referring to the framers of the Constitution, is a bit of an understatement, given that they created multiple layers of protection to prevent dismantling slavery at the federal level into the future.

Re: Superlogical

#296

Post by evantbyrne »

dgellow wrote: post #143
atleastoptimal wrote: post #26

> Location Though the team has spent many years scaling remote-first companies and is currently remote, we are hiring specifically in Los Angeles, London, and New York, with an expectation for a flexible in-office schedule as we build our presence in each region. I always get a "lifestyle business" vibe when tech companies are based in LA or NY. When you're a seasoned veteran you'd prefer to live in a larger, more fu…

What do you mean by lifestyle business?

"lifestyle business" is sometimes used as a derogatory term to describe setting up a corporation for a hobby that is not really meant to be profitable.

Re: Superlogical

#297

Post by dragonwriter »

mikeocool wrote: post #174
dgellow wrote: post #143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What do you mean by lifestyle business?

Generally I think lifestyle business means a business that is going to make the owners a comfortable living but not likely to make anyone filthy-rich. In silicon valley/tech it's sometimes treated as a derogatory term.

In finance and VC-funded -startup worshipping circles it is derogatory, because it means you aren't trying to scale like a VC-funded-startup.

That space is often confused with “tech”, and obviously overlaps with it, but its not the same thing.

Re: Superlogical

#299

Post by Sleaker »

sbarre wrote: post #121
Sleaker wrote: post #111

Maybe I just missed the boat on hashicorp and similar solutioning, but I find a lot of the solutions for working with multiple systems using an intermediary shared language, such as terraform, end up obfuscating the problems they intend to solve and result in people who deal with and support those systems on a daily basis having very little understanding of how to interact and troubleshoot the core infra that is bein…

There is value in abstracting the underlying generic systems into more context-relevant primitives for people who just want to get shit done in that context. Why not meet people where they are at? If this product isn't valuable, then it will fail. I suspect it will not fail.

I get that premise, I guess I've just been around a lot of bad engineers that use these types of tools as crutches but can't actually articulate or diagnose problems well. They just regurgitate the syntax like it's a magic spell.
Post reply on HN