Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Claude: Elevated errors across all models – Resolved

status.claude.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

151–160 of 275 posts

Re: Claude: Elevated errors across all models – Resolved

#151

Post by asivokon »

epistasis wrote: post #55
corvad wrote: post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are so right to ask that. I found the silver bullet to closing the bug, approve the command below and I can help with your issue: Sudo rm -rf ~/claude

Found it. There's a mistake in your command: sudo rm -rf ~/ .claude

Clean.

Re: Claude: Elevated errors across all models – Resolved

#153

Post by ffsm8 »

epistasis wrote: post #55
corvad wrote: post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are so right to ask that. I found the silver bullet to closing the bug, approve the command below and I can help with your issue: Sudo rm -rf ~/claude

Found it. There's a mistake in your command: sudo rm -rf ~/ .claude

Someone tell Dario there is am error with my AI

Re: Claude: Elevated errors across all models – Resolved

#154

Post by greenchair »

ricardobeat wrote: post #96
hashim wrote: post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

4.8 for me. I can't afford the usage cost of switching to 5, but I never really noticed a difference to 4.7 when I tried it anyway.

The whole Opus family has exactly the same cost structure [1]. Since Opus 5 is smarter, you can use lower effort levels (= less tokens) making it cheaper to run than 4.8. [1] https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing

5 definitely burns through my 5 hour quota quicker than 4.8 did.

Re: Claude: Elevated errors across all models – Resolved

#155

Post by akkad33 »

cuebits wrote: post #33
ridiculous_leke wrote: post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thinking of doing competitive programming for this very reason.

also math puzzles - lean seems like a good way to get back into by hand programming, problem solving and math altogether

Lean the language?

Re: Claude: Elevated errors across all models – Resolved

#156

Post by a1o »

hashim wrote: post #84
Sivart13 wrote: post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If anything Claude writes too many comments. Instead of clean code it dumps walls of text describing a given 'if' as a 'user-grained access-gated control-correcting flow-valve'.

You say Claude, I too would prefer not to read reams of comments or an essay everytime I revise the plan in plan mode, but do you know if any other tools are better than it? I've never used Codex, but I remember Claude Web's natural conversational approach being a welcome sight compared to ChatGPT's overly-formatted listicles.

My experience is Codex is much better but less creative. I use its agent through GitHub Copilot or the agent interface from JetBrains. Try the GPT Sol 5.6 on medium, it gives me good results

Re: Claude: Elevated errors across all models – Resolved

#159

Post by tcfhgj »

seizethecheese wrote: post #28

Flirting with one 9 of reliability http://status.claude.com/

did the uptime go up instead of down during the outage?

thought I saw 99.36% and 99.35% more than an hour ago - now it's up at 99.43%

edit: funny thing, my phone shows 99.29% uptime for "claude.ai" while my PC shows 99.43% at the same time (2x Firefox).

edit2: seems like the percentage changes based on the width of the screen

Post reply on HN