Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Designing Web Applications

nathanbarry.com

51–60 of 114 posts

Re: Show HN: Designing Web Applications

#51
The whole "these people are experts in CSS/HTML" shtick never works for people who aren't already decent at web design. Instead of listing their companies, mention some of the projects they've worked on.

I know who many of these people are, but that's because I have a lot of web design books on my self with their name on them.

Re: Show HN: Designing Web Applications

#52

Any chance you're going to have the book printed? I like reading on paper, still.

I haven't found a good printer to work with. Though I would also like to get some copies printed.

Colour prints are also often prohibitively expensive.

Re: Show HN: Designing Web Applications

#53

My questions as someone learning web development and always searching for new (quality) resources: Who are you? And why should I pay you $200? > Previously I led the software design team at a local startup, but in the last year I have been working independently designing and developing my own apps. After seeing the $200 price tag, I expected to read something along the lines of "My web apps have been used by over X m…

He's not going to be able to change who he is, so if he's not well known then he's not well known.

If you think being famous is what makes someone qualified to create a product you want to buy, then you're not going to buy his product. That's just the beginning and end of that question, and he shouldn't worry about that one bit.

He's not going to sell as many books as DHH would, but hopefully the product stands on its merits and will provide more value to its readers/watchers/interacters than what they paid for it. My guess is that to many it will.

Re: Show HN: Designing Web Applications

#54
I would place buy buttons with a blurb about your money back guarantee at the top right of the page. Ideally I want to know most of the information that will influence my purchase above the fold or get to it easily via links.

Re: Show HN: Designing Web Applications

#55
post #51

The whole "these people are experts in CSS/HTML" shtick never works for people who aren't already decent at web design. Instead of listing their companies, mention some of the projects they've worked on. I know who many of these people are, but that's because I have a lot of web design books on my self with their name on them.

I try to quickly explain what each person has done. They are all awesome people who have put out some really fantastic work. Honestly, I am expecting that people will recognize the names (like you did).

Re: Show HN: Designing Web Applications

#56

I like how you put the Facebook, FreshBooks and Mailchimp logos on there in the same style other websites use when saying who uses their product.

I don't know if you actually liked this or not, but I did. It displayed a deep knowledge of how to manipulate design elements to implant an idea in a user's head. There's nothing dishonest about it, it's just a design element.

Kinda ;-) I think it's dishonest if done intentionally (which I suspect it may have been), but it is also quite clever too.

Re: Show HN: Designing Web Applications

#57
post #43

My questions as someone learning web development and always searching for new (quality) resources: Who are you? And why should I pay you $200? > Previously I led the software design team at a local startup, but in the last year I have been working independently designing and developing my own apps. After seeing the $200 price tag, I expected to read something along the lines of "My web apps have been used by over X m…

I agree, $200 is way too much to pay for content from a person I've never heard of, and couldn't find any easy reference in the page. With that kind of money you can get a lot of good content in a lot of places. I just don't see the differential that would make me spend that much money on this. No known clients, no big companies in the past. It makes me hesitant to even consider buying this.

Disclaimer: I was interviewed for the book and just finished skimming through my copy.

First off, Nathan generously offers a full money back guarantee. If you don't find the book's value outweighs the cost, ask for a refund.

Second, yes, you can wade through hundreds of blog posts or whatever else to find a lot of what Nathan presents in the book. But I value my time, and the overhead of doing that filtration vs. having Nathan do it for me is worth a lot more than $200, especially if I build web apps for a living (which I do). There is relatively little new information under the sun — but I gladly pay people to package the best available information up and tie it all together nicely.

Re: Show HN: Designing Web Applications

#58

I like how you put the Facebook, FreshBooks and Mailchimp logos on there in the same style other websites use when saying who uses their product.

I don't know if you actually liked this or not, but I did. It displayed a deep knowledge of how to manipulate design elements to implant an idea in a user's head. There's nothing dishonest about it, it's just a design element.

Actually, I found it dishonest. It's the equivalent of small print to me. I'll do a walk through of my initial reaction when I saw those logos.

1) Oh! Those companies have purchased this before to make their sites better! If they stand behind the product then maybe I should look into buying it.

2) Hmm...they didn't purchase it. Maybe the creator of this product was part of the design team for those websites and he knows what he is talking about.

3) Oh.....Those are just examples of web apps.

Re: Show HN: Designing Web Applications

#59

Any chance you're going to have the book printed? I like reading on paper, still.

I haven't found a good printer to work with. Though I would also like to get some copies printed.

On-demand printing may be a good option for you: http://www.lulu.com/

Re: Show HN: Designing Web Applications

#60
I think you should take another look at your package overview images. The package for $79 and the package for $199 look about the same from a glance. I see that the packages lists different contents below but I think it should be more obvious from the large images. Nice work though, seems nicely done.
Post reply on HN