Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Superlogical

superlogical.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

211–220 of 504 posts

Re: Superlogical

#211

Post by simplism »

brandall10 wrote: post #120

This sounds like a mashup of of several things I've been playing with lately... - pi-web ( https://pi-web.dev/ ): a web frontend for the Pi coding harness which can multiplex pi sessions across multiple machines - herdr ( https://herdr.dev/ ): a fairly polished agentic multiplexer TUI, can easily spawn or destroy windows based on subagent activity - firstmate ( https://github.com/kunchenguid/firstmate ): a meta envir…

While not terminal-only, I've been using Orca (https://github.com/stablyai/orca) for the past week and it's been a great experience

Re: Superlogical

#212

Post by gizajob »

tiagod wrote: post #180
devy wrote: post #91

Wow, that "We're hiring/Career Page" link is geeksmaxxing. First time seeing `ssh superlogical.jobs` would be a way to show job descriptions in terminal!

The ssh thing is really fun, but I wish they had another way to view the openings. I'm on a connection with massive latency at the moment and it's pretty horrible UX in this case

That’s probably not the type of connection they’re looking for employees to have.

Re: Superlogical

#213

Post by dijksterhuis »

rixed wrote: post #196

Meta, won't comment on the site, won't click. I'm fed up with this category of click baity titles that are designed to be enigmatic rather than informative. The guideline do not mention this, apart maybe from: If the title includes the name of the site, please take it out, because the site name will be displayed after the link. I'd prefer HN if we made it a habit to editorialize such titles consisting solely of a Dom…

The actual header on the page is

> We are building the multiplexer for all work.

imo this would have been a better way to do the HN submission title (with or without [terminal])

> Superlogical: We are building the [terminal] multiplexer for all work

Re: Superlogical

#214

Post by catlikesshrimp »

p-o wrote: post #113
catlikesshrimp wrote: post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I may be going astray, but I can see a way to degenerate "taxes paid" to "taxes before deductions" to "income since it relates to taxes anyways"

It doesn't have to be that complicated. Just absolute terms could have the desired effect. - 1% tax of 10 million = 100k - 20% tax of 100k = 20k Hence, the rich pays more tax.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_returns_of_Donald_Trump "Trump paid no net federal income taxes in 11 of 18 years of the past two decades. After the refund, Trump had an average tax bill of $1.4 million per year over the 18 years.[52][176] In 2016, Trump paid only $750 in federal income tax, and in 2017, he paid another $750 in federal income tax."

If there was an unequal vote, I am pretty sure rich people would want votes as heavy as possible.

Re: Superlogical

#216

Post by Lalabadie »

win311fwg wrote: post #83
Lalabadie wrote: post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That would be true if he advocated for votes according to effective taxation rate or something similar. He caps his example at 800k reported income, if I remember, which is a rounding error to his income class. Instead, he makes sure to include the idea of stripping low-income people of all voting rights.

> which is a rounding error to his income class. Not at all. The idea is that his class claim very little income, if any income. His income class is ~$0 (or believed to be, at least). You can certainly make an argument that the claim isn't true, that the ultra-wealthy are actually already paying huge sums in income tax, but then you cannot take the thread out of context. It was clearly directed at those who believe t…

Lutke's own post was about pension = no votes, which I identify as the thing he decided to actually spent time on. His other tweet is a Musk-like "Good idea" reply to someone else's proposal regarding tax brackets, no?

I don't think memory fails me on the main points. If you think ranking the same read facts differently from you means faulty reading, I don't really owe you the labor of explaining where that fails.

Re: Superlogical

#217

Post by dijksterhuis »

jeremyjh wrote: post #207
rixed wrote: post #196

Meta, won't comment on the site, won't click. I'm fed up with this category of click baity titles that are designed to be enigmatic rather than informative. The guideline do not mention this, apart maybe from: If the title includes the name of the site, please take it out, because the site name will be displayed after the link. I'd prefer HN if we made it a habit to editorialize such titles consisting solely of a Dom…

Without clicking you’d never know why it’s the title.

that's kinda the point -- titles on HN usually indicate the sort of content that's behind clicking through, and whether it might be something interesting to the prospective reader. this one doesn't because it's the name of the company.

Re: Superlogical

#219

Post by bryanlarsen »

Sounds like something that could be done with by pulling in a few dozen Emacs extensions and writing a few thousand lines of elisp. (And one of those extensions would be the libghostty base ghostel.)

It's sort of what I'm doing already -- using emacs-server to provide portable persistent sessions on top of a bunch of terminals, agents and editor buffers.

It's a 1% effort on my part and super janky and super me-specific -- if somebody put a small fraction of the effort into it that others are putting into superlogical and the other alternatives listed here, it could be awesome....

Re: Superlogical

#220

Post by pama »

Serious question: if one were willing to give up on curses, isn’t Emacs/elisp providing the best multiplexing system available to humankind? And conceptually, why would agents ever need to depend on curses?
Post reply on HN