Live data from Hacker News

Superlogical

superlogical.com

201–210 of 504 posts

Re: Superlogical

#202

Earlier quoted context omitted.

VCs tend to be a toxic bunch. Hard to avoid that in our business

in this case mitchell is an exited founder with a net worth of over $1B so he can be choosier than almost anyone in this regard. Deeply disappointing he is taking money from Guillermo

things look different from Billionaire Island than they do to us plebs down here. it's crazy to expect such people to do the "right" thing, they're too far gone.

Re: Superlogical

#203
post #15

I'm sorry to take it out on this specific announcement, as it just seems to be one of many "offenders", but why are the 15 investors listed on an announcement blog post of a semi-stealth startup? With most of them being VC or high-count angel investors, they can combined push whatever product is being built here into 200+ companies independent of whether it is good or not. What happened to the good old way of figurin…

Ghostty and libghostty was product market fit. Superlogical (allegedly) uses it for the multiplexer. Mitchell Hashimoto is just the icing on the cake and he has a track record of building defining dev tools used by millions of devs. So it makes sense why you see 15 angel investors. More money / investment in the dev tool space is great for everyone!

yes, dev tooling investment has always been disappointing. Mainly due to stingy buyers.

Re: Superlogical

#204
post #175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thanks, it’s a bit concerning that’s not considered the default

That's not the original meaning of a "lifestyle business" anyways, which is more like a business that makes enough (to its owners, nothing to do with the employees) for them to maintain their desired lifestyle, like maybe a few million in revenue or whatever, but can't / won't be scaled beyond that because their lifestyle is already well supported by the current business growth / volume / revenue so they have no inte…

Ah ok, in that case Superlogical doesn’t sound like a lifestyle business given the number of VCs involved

Re: Superlogical

#205

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Care about what? About what you yourself said? "Canada could use a system to encourage the wealthy to claim income, where that is incentivized by being able to vote". The ultra-wealthy can already influence elections in very significant ways. Getting 5 votes instead of 1, which makes no actual difference to any election, is not something that will suddenly make the ultra wealthy wanting to pay more income tax. What…

> I'm not buying your unfounded claim that Tobi is just joking bro. Fair enough. Let me be a little more precise here: Eric Thor was clearly poking the bear of those who believe that the wealthy don't pay tax. I mean, his voting suggestion concludes with exactly that. Maybe Tobi is so far out to lunch that he didn't notice and took it as an actual plan, but, then again, if you are suggesting that he is that far out t…

> Nobody of sound mind wastes time writing stupid comments on the internet if they have an actual motive.

I mean Musk? You even used it as an example of "just trolling" in your previous message. He invested north of $300M+ in the last presidential election, also injected massive amounts in various local races, as well as foreign elections.

What more do you need to take them seriously? Even if somehow Musk was doing all of this to troll people because to him $500M is nothing, the impact on those elections is real, so it doesn't even matter what is internal reasons are.

Re: Superlogical

#206
post #175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's not the original meaning of a "lifestyle business" anyways, which is more like a business that makes enough (to its owners, nothing to do with the employees) for them to maintain their desired lifestyle, like maybe a few million in revenue or whatever, but can't / won't be scaled beyond that because their lifestyle is already well supported by the current business growth / volume / revenue so they have no inte…

Ah ok, in that case Superlogical doesn’t sound like a lifestyle business given the number of VCs involved

Yes, indeed, although i think in this case it was just signalling how not being "SF focused" might be seen as a lack of ambition or whatever in such VC contexts or something and thus the exaggerated comparison to it being a lifestyle business merely due to the location requirements on ny/la (nicer cities to live in, maybe, than SF, or whatever)

i think just michael is based on LA, so he prefers having the offices near his home (has kids, etc), and has enough FU money to not need to let the VC's dictate where the HQ's are located at.

I guess also they dont love the idea of managing people remotely for a small startup/first hires, although im sure for the right person they wouldn't really care (or usually this is how it goes on most small companies/startups)

Re: Superlogical

#207
post #196

Meta, won't comment on the site, won't click. I'm fed up with this category of click baity titles that are designed to be enigmatic rather than informative. The guideline do not mention this, apart maybe from: If the title includes the name of the site, please take it out, because the site name will be displayed after the link. I'd prefer HN if we made it a habit to editorialize such titles consisting solely of a Dom…

Without clicking you’d never know why it’s the title.

Re: Superlogical

#209

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bun and the Rust pre-release have continued to be open source; the pre-release isn’t exclusive to Claude Code but available to anyone to download and use. There hasn’t been any public motion to indicate they may close source anytime soon. This FUD is so easily fact-checkable that I’m genuinely confused at how it caught on

> I’m genuinely confused at how it caught on Probably because they said AI rewrote it in 11 days, yet haven't cut a release almost 2 months later. If their AI finished it, where's the release? They ported enough of it to run a single app (Claude Code). Good job. But if I ported Linux to Rust and it was only capable of running a single app, should I be able say it was a complete port? We'd all agree that was misleadin…

> If their AI finished it, where's the release?

`bun upgrade --canary`. You can use it today.

Keeping a large release, like a total rewrite, on canary for a while to iron out bugs is a very reasonable software engineering practice.

Re: Superlogical

#210
post #196

Meta, won't comment on the site, won't click. I'm fed up with this category of click baity titles that are designed to be enigmatic rather than informative. The guideline do not mention this, apart maybe from: If the title includes the name of the site, please take it out, because the site name will be displayed after the link. I'd prefer HN if we made it a habit to editorialize such titles consisting solely of a Dom…

[deleted]
Post reply on HN