Live data from Hacker News

Superlogical

superlogical.com

61–70 of 504 posts

Re: Superlogical

#61

It sounds like they're building a super-root which can destroy your whole infrastructure at once ??? From their website: "Building and operating software today spans local machines, remote hosts, sandboxes, services, and production systems. It has many modes of operation: interactively with a human developer, automatically through CI and background processes, and increasingly through agents working in parallel. [...]…

It’s a terminal multiplexer. Nothing in this announcement suggests to me that using this multiplexer will require the user to get root or super-root or any additional permissions. It’s what the user already has access to, but more “durable” (which I take a mean terminal session history on by default). And I don’t believe any short-lived secrets like ephemeral keys could have their lifetime extended by a terminal multiplexer. And nothing really supersedes RBAC which any respectable org should be using always.

Re: Superlogical

#62
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

more info please!

He thinks ability to vote (and the number of votes you get) should be based on income. https://vancouverisland.ctvnews.ca/business/article/shopify-...

If you read it again you will notice that technically he thinks that, to satisfy those who believe the wealthy don't pay tax, Canada could use a system to encourage the wealthy to claim income, where that is incentivized by being able to vote. Often the wealthy have no need for income as they already have so much wealth and can easily borrow against that wealth as cash needs present themselves. It is believed (at least as far as the thread went) that the wealthy currently don't pay tax, and thus would be unable to vote, or their vote would count for little, under the proposed since they don't have sufficient income to qualify.

Re: Superlogical

#65
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He thinks ability to vote (and the number of votes you get) should be based on income. https://vancouverisland.ctvnews.ca/business/article/shopify-...

Taxes paid was actually what was said.

[deleted]

Re: Superlogical

#66
> We will build a high-quality terminal multiplexer that remains excellent at that job, even as it grows to support the second and third parts of the plan.

why this feels the next step is data collection and Ads?

Re: Superlogical

#67
It’s interesting because in an ideal world he is practically building a NixOS config.

I’m pretty new to NixOS (a few months) but i could envision using Nix to declarativey configure tmux windows and panes in a dev shell. That said, Nix feels like it might still be too clunky at this point in time to quickly re-declare window and panel arrangements. But I never tried and it could be possible.

Re: Superlogical

#68
We're a team that has spent our entire careers building some of the most widely used developer tooling, infrastructure software, and AI systems.

Not being snarky. What AI systems have they built?

Re: Superlogical

#69
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He thinks ability to vote (and the number of votes you get) should be based on income. https://vancouverisland.ctvnews.ca/business/article/shopify-...

Taxes paid was actually what was said.

I may be going astray, but I can see a way to degenerate "taxes paid" to "taxes before deductions" to "income since it relates to taxes anyways"

Re: Superlogical

#70
Really exciting IMO. Many people are working on new work interfaces (e.g. Codex/Claude/Cursor, multiplayer agent spaces, unified Slack/Notion/Zoom, etc.), and I think the Superlogical vision makes sense as a competitor in the space, at least to try.

There’s clearly room to improve our existing tools.

Post reply on HN