Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Superlogical

superlogical.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

21–30 of 504 posts

Re: Superlogical

#21

Post by dust-jacket »

hobofan wrote: post #15

I'm sorry to take it out on this specific announcement, as it just seems to be one of many "offenders", but why are the 15 investors listed on an announcement blog post of a semi-stealth startup? With most of them being VC or high-count angel investors, they can combined push whatever product is being built here into 200+ companies independent of whether it is good or not. What happened to the good old way of figurin…

I think the generous take would be...

- it demonstrates they have funding (pre-empting "no-one will fund something weird like this")

- its transparent and open (pre-empting "which bastards are the ones who really own it?")

Re: Superlogical

#22

Post by user- »

Im assuming that they've noticed tools like CMUX and Herdr (cmux is using libghostty too and i use herdr in ghostty) and this is gonna be similar?

Re: Superlogical

#25

Post by dominotw »

i just have log.md that keeps a running log of things as i work though a project. thats all my claude code needs to navigate 'session' across systems.

Re: Superlogical

#26

Post by atleastoptimal »

> Location Though the team has spent many years scaling remote-first companies and is currently remote, we are hiring specifically in Los Angeles, London, and New York, with an expectation for a flexible in-office schedule as we build our presence in each region.

I always get a "lifestyle business" vibe when tech companies are based in LA or NY. When you're a seasoned veteran you'd prefer to live in a larger, more fun city, even though tech is concentrated in the Bay Area

Re: Superlogical

#27

Post by pphysch »

bjt wrote: post #13
jollyllama wrote: post #10

> We believe the missing layer is a durable session around the work itself Curious as to how this will be different than K8s?

I'm curious from the other direction; where do you see overlap between k8s and what's described on the Superlogical website?

> For us, that means interactive work, automatic work, and production work would share one well-crafted underlying system instead of living in separate tools.

Unless this is only for the narrow band of purely local work, I would be surprised if k8s didn't play a big role in the backend solution. It is the standard "well-crafted underlying system" for automatic production work. But, it isn't strong in the interactive-work/frontend aspect or other aspects, so it certainly wouldn't be the main focus of the final product.

Random example: you want to multiplex some work across multiple (self-hosted) agents, using niche fine-tuned models. It would make good sense if those agents were automatically provisioned and deprovisioned (and isolated to your subtenant), and k8s is a great underlying system for that sort of thing.

Re: Superlogical

#28

Post by jollyllama »

bjt wrote: post #13
jollyllama wrote: post #10

> We believe the missing layer is a durable session around the work itself Curious as to how this will be different than K8s?

I'm curious from the other direction; where do you see overlap between k8s and what's described on the Superlogical website?

Doesn't K8s already practically provide a layer of abstraction across all infrastructure? You might not think of it as being a session, but to the degree that it's responsible for managing scaling and failover, it kind of is.

This isn't a statement of value, I'm genuinely curious myself. In fact, I bet this new thing will probably be better.

Re: Superlogical

#30

Post by asymmetric »

vanagandr wrote: post #16

If its got Mitchell, I’m in. To make it more relevant: right now I mostly rely on tmux. Before that I’ve been a long time user of screen (irssi over ssh people know this play). Looking forward to this.

[flagged]
Post reply on HN