Earlier quoted context omitted.
If random opining is worth any more than zero on HN… then can’t anyone else, also opine that they have more “soul” than ”mrbukkake”?
This is a textbook example of a logical fallacy called "poisoning the well", implying that because a user has a crass username that their opinions do not deserve to be treated with the same value as someone who posts under their feasibly real world name. To be rational, you should take opinions as written, not considering the writer, and debate them on their merits alone. Not that their opinion was rational, as we ha…
The point of the reply clearly wasn’t about pointing out a weird username.
But about the possibility of random opining having zero or non zero value.