Live data from Hacker News

Substack writers, you need a website

elizabethtai.com

311–320 of 373 posts

Re: Substack writers, you need a website

#311

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's sort of disgusting that inbox clutter from a publishing service is the dominant delivery paradigm as opposed to browsers natively checking bookmarked RSS feeds.

Email is so well designed, so resilient, and so ubiquitous that's very hard to displace it's use as a central check-in.

I want very badly to use RSS to read everything, and I still use RSS a lot. But I have to admit that email won the resiliency battle a long time ago.

Re: Substack writers, you need a website

#312
Great idea.

Recently, I’ve decided to get back into blogging. It’s surprisingly easy these days. I already have a domain on Cloudflare, and I had Codex build a simple blogging system for me. I write everything in Markdown, the site is hosted on Cloudflare, comments are stored in Cloudflare D1, and all articles live in the repository as Markdown files. GitHub Actions takes care of publishing automatically and also performs regular backups. To reduce comment spam, I use Cloudflare Turnstile, which has been working really well. For comment moderation, I protect the admin interface with Cloudflare Zero Trust, using email-based authentication, so I don’t need to build or maintain my own authentication system. Overall, the setup has been incredibly simple, reliable, and has required very little ongoing maintenance.

Re: Substack writers, you need a website

#313

Great idea. Recently, I’ve decided to get back into blogging. It’s surprisingly easy these days. I already have a domain on Cloudflare, and I had Codex build a simple blogging system for me. I write everything in Markdown, the site is hosted on Cloudflare, comments are stored in Cloudflare D1, and all articles live in the repository as Markdown files. GitHub Actions takes care of publishing automatically and also per…

This is not a simple setup. Most people would be just fine with a static site that can be hosted for free on Netlify, Cloudfare Pages, GitHub Pages and so on.

Re: Substack writers, you need a website

#314
post #86
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Substack notes is non exportable; the newsletter now no longer have a link to read it on your site on substack and instead link to the substack app, and subscriptions started in the app pay Substack through Apple and Google and you can't export them. Substack has become a roach motel but they pretend otherwise

Thanks for this. I can hear Substack marketing saying that “We don’t have any intention to put you into a vendor-lock.” I had a lot of discussions with companies about their marketing. Why do you upload your events’ photos to FB instead of your site? Why do you have news on LI feed and don’t make it a post on your site as well? Do you think they can hear it? :) Substack is going to become a similar service as FB, LI…

They've already started requiring you to be signed in to view content, so I'd argue that have already become, not going to become.

Re: Substack writers, you need a website

#315

Counterpoint from someone who's been publishing on the internet for decades: no one will visit your website. It's as simple as that. You need a push mechanism to reach readers. RSS could be it, but it's too niche. Social media is kinda it, but algorithmic feeds reward political clickbait and just because someone clicks "follow" or "subscribe" is not a guarantee that they will ever see your posts. Substack gives you a…

you said: "...from someone who's been publishing on the internet for decades: no one will visit your website" This is false. It's more accurate to say that "no one will visit your website if you do not properly setup a distribution ecosystem". It's hard work. But it works. All of my companies have been built by writing online --> distribution --> people finding my/our stuff. Your experience of 'doing it for decades'…

I publish links to my new articles on Reddit , sometimes on Twitter. That’s enough for my posts to get to lots of people, sometimes. And when it happens, Google indexes it and it becomes one of the first links about the topics I covered. And people repost it later in other media like Mastodon, HN etc.

I don’t get how someone can have used the internet for decades and not know how this all works!

Re: Substack writers, you need a website

#316
Substack fails to deliver the single thing it supposed to do - great reading experience.

The website itself is slow, it cannot render the whole comments section, it constantly nags readers with subscribe forms.

It can not handle single account across my subscriptions.

Its just crap.

Re: Substack writers, you need a website

#317

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion this is a load-bearing condition, also nobody thinks that punching a nazi makes someone a nazi

Scratch liberal and a fascist bleeds.

I feel like you're probably interpreting that saying in the opposite of its intended meaning but there's not enough context to know for sure.

Re: Substack writers, you need a website

#318
I’m the founder of Tertulia so take this with appropriate grain of salt.

I (unsurprisingly) agree authors should own their own website and email list (btw based on hundreds of data points we know converts about 100 to 1 versus social followers for book sales) but the issue is how to make it effortless to set up and maintain a website.

We built a system where you enter one ISBN and we instantly import your entire book catalog, including books, reviews, metadata, author bio, etc. Btw one book to all the authors’ books is not trivial problem (see how often Amazon gets it wrong) due to lack of universal author ID. We’ve since built author-specific email marketing, ecommerce, etc all on a domain each author owns (we make it seamless). Now that we have 9k+ happy (65 NPS) authors we’re adding author cross promotion for distribution but the author’s owned domain and capturing their own emails remains at center.

Anyways if anyone wants to check it out for free (no CC needed) would welcome feedback from HN community. https://authors.tertulia.com/

Re: Substack writers, you need a website

#319
post #316

Substack fails to deliver the single thing it supposed to do - great reading experience. The website itself is slow, it cannot render the whole comments section, it constantly nags readers with subscribe forms. It can not handle single account across my subscriptions. Its just crap.

We have made peace with the dichotomy of a computer delivering AAA titles at 4k 144Hz while simultaneously struggling to render a few hundred comments on Substack.

Re: Substack writers, you need a website

#320

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I think that one should at least have one's own domain instead of example.substack.com. I thought about this question when I recently started writing a few articles on Substack. I chose not to use my own domain, even though I have a few. Why? I want my writing to outlive me. When I am no longer able to pay for domain renewals, my own domains will expire. Hopefully {my-hn-username}.substack.com will still be around.…

It's very unlikely Substack will still be around when you die, if you're younger than 60.

What if I'm 74? ;-)
Post reply on HN