National Security Determination Threat Posed by Foreign-Produced Robotic Devices [pdf]
1–10 of 77 posts
Re: National Security Determination Threat Posed by Foreign-Produced Robotic Devices [pdf]
#2Thanks Trump
Re: National Security Determination Threat Posed by Foreign-Produced Robotic Devices [pdf]
#3Re: National Security Determination Threat Posed by Foreign-Produced Robotic Devices [pdf]
#4Re: National Security Determination Threat Posed by Foreign-Produced Robotic Devices [pdf]
#5>
> To facilitate this transition period, entities that produce advanced robotic devices in a foreign country are encouraged to apply for Conditional Approvals (Annex A) which, if approved, will allow such producers to continue to receive FCC authorization for their products while they work to onshore manufacturing and address the U.S. government’s national security concerns described above.
Re: National Security Determination Threat Posed by Foreign-Produced Robotic Devices [pdf]
#6> As the technology matures, advanced robotic devices have growing use cases in monitoring and securing critical infrastructure.
...cites:
'Secret Service uses robot dogs to guard Trump's Mar-a-Lago in FL' as reported in the Palm Beach Daily News
Re: National Security Determination Threat Posed by Foreign-Produced Robotic Devices [pdf]
#7Re: National Security Determination Threat Posed by Foreign-Produced Robotic Devices [pdf]
#8Re: National Security Determination Threat Posed by Foreign-Produced Robotic Devices [pdf]
#9Re: National Security Determination Threat Posed by Foreign-Produced Robotic Devices [pdf]
#10This makes me wonder if we've ever had any evidence that "onshore manufacturing" prevents or even lessens foreign backdoors or security vulnerabilities. Honestly, to me it seems like onshore manufacturers are generally far more clueless than they have any right to be, so it's highly unlikely that they could both write materially better code and act as any meaningful barrier to internal compromise.
Gaslighting as a policy.