Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: How far do I have to go to run into 100k people?

imjasonh.github.io

41–50 of 54 posts

Re: Show HN: How far do I have to go to run into 100k people?

#43
Neat! I've got a slice that's under 10 miles long going south into town, but I've also got 14 slices to the north (the ones that don't intersect with a couple up-state cities) that are over 3000 miles long.

Vancouver is similarly interesting, a lot of great-circle 2000+ mile segments that reach over towards New England, but everything west or north is invalid.

Would be neat if instead of a single yellow petal to 100k, each petal was a color gradient to 1k, 2k, 10k, 20k, 100k, 200k, or 1M people!

Re: Show HN: How far do I have to go to run into 100k people?

#44
post #22

Really cool. Makes me wonder where the most remote point in the contiguous U.S. is by this metric.

I'm having a hard time finding any place that produces a ray longer than about 900 miles. I found a spot in NW South Dakota whose shortest rays are nearly 300 miles.

Try a little NE of Seattle.

Re: Show HN: How far do I have to go to run into 100k people?

#47

I must be slightly confused about what claims this visualization is making. Are these 5 degree rays supposed to be indicating non-overlapping triangles where each triangle contains 100k population? If so, a full circle (with no triangles missing) would be a population of 7.2 million. And yet, clicking around Los Angeles County you can easily find multiple completely non-overlapping full circles, despite the county po…

Yeah, this can't possibly be right. Los Angeles, the city, has less than 4 million people, and there are complete "circles" of presumably 7.2 million people entirely within its boundaries.

If you set the petal population threshold to a low value, like 10k or 20k, and drag it to a densely populated area like Koreatown, you'll get a degenerate "circle" with 0 feet in every direction.

Re: Show HN: How far do I have to go to run into 100k people?

#48
post #3
post #2

That seems like the distance to go from having 100k people in front of you to having 100k people behind you. The distance you'd have to go to run into them properly would depend critically on the width of the vehicle you're in. With about 30k people running the Boston marathon and 60k people running the NY marathon, if you can source a vehicle wide enough to cover the course, it seems like you could pull it off in ju…

Ah interesting, I seen the title "run into" as "bump into" or in this context, get to where 100k people are. I don't know any US addresses far from population centers so I pumped in Area 51! Clarity needed on the title or description!

I thought the same thing and further that it really depends on what time of the day it was and who was out of their houses to be able to run into them.

Re: Show HN: How far do I have to go to run into 100k people?

#49
post #2

That seems like the distance to go from having 100k people in front of you to having 100k people behind you. The distance you'd have to go to run into them properly would depend critically on the width of the vehicle you're in. With about 30k people running the Boston marathon and 60k people running the NY marathon, if you can source a vehicle wide enough to cover the course, it seems like you could pull it off in ju…

Careful… Reddit might try and find you.
Post reply on HN