Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Apple Upgrade

apple.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–17 of 17 posts

Re: Apple Upgrade

#11

Post by apparent »

cousinbryce wrote: post #10
apparent wrote: post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you concerned that they are going to do this to purchased devices? That would seem to be a PR disaster if it happened by accident, and a catastrophe if they ever did it on purpose. I assume there would be many safeguards in place to ensure that it cannot happen on purchased devices (though devices purchased on a payment plan could be subject to it).

We don’t live in a time of safeguards my friend

I would be more worried about a company doing things that could be done surreptitiously, like spying on users. That could happen for years without the user knowing.

Nerfing a device, OTOH, is very obvious and would create a huge backlash. The safeguards would not be in place solely for the benefit of the user, but also for the benefit of the company.

Re: Apple Upgrade

#12

Post by justsomehnguy »

apparent wrote: post #7
mainecoder wrote: post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

what is interesting is if this code for restriction for leased devices is also contained for regular phones so they could do the same to those with regular phones....

Are you concerned that they are going to do this to purchased devices? That would seem to be a PR disaster if it happened by accident, and a catastrophe if they ever did it on purpose. I assume there would be many safeguards in place to ensure that it cannot happen on purchased devices (though devices purchased on a payment plan could be subject to it).

Did you forgot Batterygate already?

Re: Apple Upgrade

#13

Post by apparent »

justsomehnguy wrote: post #12
apparent wrote: post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you concerned that they are going to do this to purchased devices? That would seem to be a PR disaster if it happened by accident, and a catastrophe if they ever did it on purpose. I assume there would be many safeguards in place to ensure that it cannot happen on purchased devices (though devices purchased on a payment plan could be subject to it).

Did you forgot Batterygate already?

What an interesting analogy. What would Apple stand to gain by nerfing phones that customers had already fully paid for? Is the theory that Apple would hold the devices hostage until more payments were made? That would seem to be an unmitigated disaster for the company.

With batterygate, there was a plausible reason for Apple to do what it did, but also self-interest that could have caused it. Here, there is no remotely discernible self-interest that would lead Apple to nuke its reputation by holding fully-paid devices hostage.

Re: Apple Upgrade

#14

Post by justsomehnguy »

apparent wrote: post #13
justsomehnguy wrote: post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Did you forgot Batterygate already?

What an interesting analogy. What would Apple stand to gain by nerfing phones that customers had already fully paid for? Is the theory that Apple would hold the devices hostage until more payments were made? That would seem to be an unmitigated disaster for the company. With batterygate, there was a plausible reason for Apple to do what it did, but also self-interest that could have caused it. Here, there is no remot…

You missed the most important part: what Apple fanbois would not just tolerate it but would invent a way to rationalize it and sell it to themselves under 'it's actually good for us'. Just like they did during with Batterygate and a charging port on a mouse' bottom.

Just did a little test: https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=apple+mouse+charging+port+b...

And the first result is:

    AppleInsider

    https://appleinsider.com › articles › 24 › 10 › 29 › apples-magic-mouse-charging-port-design-has-never-been-a-big-deal

    Keeping the Magic Mouse charging port on the base is fine
    Oct 29, 2024 The newly updated Apple Magic Mouse now has a USB-C charging port, but it's still on the bottom — *and that still doesn't matter.*
EDIT: I don't know if Apple would find a way to actually use it but regarding "PR disaster if it happened by accident, and a catastrophe if they ever did it on purpose" - it would be not.

Re: Apple Upgrade

#15

Post by apparent »

justsomehnguy wrote: post #14
apparent wrote: post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What an interesting analogy. What would Apple stand to gain by nerfing phones that customers had already fully paid for? Is the theory that Apple would hold the devices hostage until more payments were made? That would seem to be an unmitigated disaster for the company. With batterygate, there was a plausible reason for Apple to do what it did, but also self-interest that could have caused it. Here, there is no remot…

You missed the most important part: what Apple fanbois would not just tolerate it but would invent a way to rationalize it and sell it to themselves under 'it's actually good for us'. Just like they did during with Batterygate and a charging port on a mouse' bottom. Just did a little test: https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=apple+mouse+charging+port+b... And the first result is: AppleInsider https://appleinsider.com ›…

OK cool, well LMK what the reason would be for Apple to ever do that, and I'll be happy to walk through your thought experiment about how fanboys would love to have their devices nerfed.

Re: Apple Upgrade

#16

Post by justsomehnguy »

apparent wrote: post #15
justsomehnguy wrote: post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You missed the most important part: what Apple fanbois would not just tolerate it but would invent a way to rationalize it and sell it to themselves under 'it's actually good for us'. Just like they did during with Batterygate and a charging port on a mouse' bottom. Just did a little test: https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=apple+mouse+charging+port+b... And the first result is: AppleInsider https://appleinsider.com ›…

OK cool, well LMK what the reason would be for Apple to ever do that, and I'll be happy to walk through your thought experiment about how fanboys would love to have their devices nerfed.

> would love to have their devices nerfed

I provided an article on how they would love it.

I don't know if you have seen the EDIT in my previous comment.

> what the reason would be for Apple to ever do that

There is one glaring reason - money. I don't know if they would do it but there is no question what they would at least think about it, especially considering they do/would have the knobs to do it.

Re: Apple Upgrade

#17

Post by apparent »

justsomehnguy wrote: post #16
apparent wrote: post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

OK cool, well LMK what the reason would be for Apple to ever do that, and I'll be happy to walk through your thought experiment about how fanboys would love to have their devices nerfed.

> would love to have their devices nerfed I provided an article on how they would love it . I don't know if you have seen the EDIT in my previous comment. > what the reason would be for Apple to ever do that There is one glaring reason - money. I don't know if they would do it but there is no question what they would at least think about it, especially considering they do/would have the knobs to do it.

Can you explain how Apple would make money in the medium-term (let alone long-term) if they used this feature on fully-paid devices?

Also, they have now officially said it won't even be used on leased devices. [1]

1: https://www.theverge.com/tech/972063/apple-upgrade-program-n...

Post reply on HN