Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, he wanted to insult the person. The word портянка is sometimes used in the Internet by Ukrainian nationalists to offend pro-Russian users.
> nationalists No, not nationalists, just regular people who all wish that Russia finally ceases to exist.
Third Drone Shot Down in Three Days in Romanian Territory
321–325 of 325 posts
Re: Third Drone Shot Down in Three Days in Romanian Territory
#322Earlier quoted context omitted.
See gattr's comment above Basically GROM getting "leave" and then ending up with their whole team inside Ukraine as "contractors", just with deniability. https://militarywatchmagazine.com/article/polish-mercenaries... Regarding efforts to provide deniability for their operations, a Polish officer informed him: “we worked out a formula for our presence in Ukraine … we were simply sent on paid leave. Politicians preten…
It's always amusing when one side claims what the presence of NATO personnel in UA is "just Russian lies" only to post the confirmation of it themselves. It's even more amusing when you see pictures like this https://i.redd.it/ex4jgoqir4qg1.png
Or claims that EU is freezing to death or food running out (or soon will be)
Re: Third Drone Shot Down in Three Days in Romanian Territory
#323Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah a solid propaganda arm of the French government
Not the only one though: I remember what happened when we 'invaded' Lybia: not one criticism in the French news anywhere, total censorship, even though our media had widely and correctly criticised the US for the Irak war.. So I think the best thing is to get news from everywhere Russia, China, the US, Europe, but that's a lot of work..
Re: Third Drone Shot Down in Three Days in Romanian Territory
#324Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is also not possible as there is censorship in some cases. The European Union has blocked rt.com.
That is blocked because far too many EU residents were taking it as 100% fact and acting upon it. The block is only DNS level, IIRC, and doesn't affect VPNs.
Re: Third Drone Shot Down in Three Days in Romanian Territory
#325Earlier quoted context omitted.
As compared to what more trustworthy, honest news sources? Please name a few, I'm curious.
Usually the argument is that because a reputable news agency with a history of high quality journalism made once a mistake, it's better to listen to some angry podcaster with a history inviting cooky nutcase, or sketchy Twitter account with history of boosting fake news as jokes.