Live data from Hacker News

About the security content of macOS Tahoe 26.6

support.apple.com

131–140 of 157 posts

Re: About the security content of macOS Tahoe 26.6

#131
post #46
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So using newish phones that don't get updated anymore could be a lot more dangerous now than it was just a year ago.

Right - it was always dangerous but people who figured they weren’t important enough to be attacked might find out that LLMs have shifted that cost in the wrong direction.

That sucks.

Re: About the security content of macOS Tahoe 26.6

#132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

macOS 17 is decisively faster on my MacBook Air M1 16 GB than macOS 26/27 is on my MacBook Pro M2 Max 32 GB. And I don’t mean just the animations themselves but lag/sluggishness/responsiveness in general.

There is no macOS 17.

Gosh I thought I had edited it to macOS 15, now it’s too late

Re: About the security content of macOS Tahoe 26.6

#133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As long as the UI improves and I can ignore all the AI stuff they're starting to push through, that's fine with me, though like many longtime macOS users, I'm not holding my breath for a bug-free experience.

> though like many longtime macOS users For those of us older than just 10 years of using macOS, the older Apple OSes have instilled within us the desire to never install the X.0 release and wait until at least the X.1 release. The bug-free experience is a myth

> wait until at least the X.1 release

I think that applies to almost all software, not just Apple OSes. After all, Confucius said: "The only thing worse than old software is new software."

Re: About the security content of macOS Tahoe 26.6

#134

15.7.8 is out today as well, with these security fixes: https://support.apple.com/en-us/128071 . For context, there have been issues with MacOS 26 which have led many people to defer upgrading until MacOS 27 is available, and MacOS 15 is the previous version.

Same thing happens almost every release. I've stopped updating my Mac machine until I see something in the release notes I literally have to have in order to continue doing macOS/iOS builds, otherwise I'm staying on the version I've validated to work, and I know the existing bugs with.

As we used to say in the Windows world, wait for service pack 3.

Re: About the security content of macOS Tahoe 26.6

#135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He left in 2019 and formed his own company, that did design work for Apple until 2022. He "took" several Apple employees with him when he left and there's been a steady stream of Apple employees going to OpenAI. Ive isn’t responsible for all of them obviously, but the articles about lawsuits says there are 400 former Apple employees at OpenAI.

Sounds like Apple needs to do a better job at being a place where employees want to stay.

Or, good that the craze for ever thinner laptops has been slowed?

Re: About the security content of macOS Tahoe 26.6

#136
post #26
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One CVE even lists the same person twice! CVE-2026-64691: Ruslan Dautov, Ruslan Dautov

> One CVE even lists the same person twice! Not necessarily. Could be two persons sharing that name. See https://revstat.ine.pt/index.php/REVSTAT/article/view/382

How did you unearth such a remarkable find of 2 different faculty individuals named "Philipp Otto" collaborating on the same paper :) ?

Re: About the security content of macOS Tahoe 26.6

#137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can already turn off most glass effects in 26 via "System Settings => Accessibility => Display => Reduce Transparency". I had that turned off years ago (for reasons I don't remember), and was wondering what all the fuzz was about when 26 came out because I didn't see much of a difference ;) IMHO the actual important visual changes in the 27 beta is that rolls back the bizarre oversized corner radius in Finder win…

It's the first thing I turn off on a new iPhone or iPad. Started around ten years ago in the release which had animated app icons. Induced nausea.

Yep. That’s why it’s in accessibility - some people can’t handle it. Other useful options are reduce motion, reduce transparency…

Re: About the security content of macOS Tahoe 26.6

#138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Fortunately, those can run Linux. I recently installed Arch on an Intel T2. The only issue is that it does not have a TPM module, so the LUKS password needs to be manually entered at boot.

What's the alternative to typing in a LUKS password?

You can use TPM with secure boot to store the password. TPM checks that the firmware is the same and that the OS is signed by trusted (by _you_) keys, and if everything matches it makes the key available for reading by the OS.

Re: About the security content of macOS Tahoe 26.6

#139
post #81
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

macOS 27 does polish Liquid Glass and makes it look passable on macOS IMHO. It was very bad on 26. Comically bad.

That's the sad thing: Apple decided to leave all Intel macs on broken macOS 26. Very bad on Apple's part.

I believe this is the definitive resource on the state of Linux on Intel MacBook Pros: https://github.com/Dunedan/mbp-2016-linux

I recently made the move away from an out-of-support macOS 12 Monterey to Debian Stable (13 trixie), after some failed attempts to upgrade macOS using OpenCore Legacy Patcher.

While Linux support will always remain far from perfect with that series of MBP, it was still much better than I expected compared to my last look many years ago. I happen to get better use out of my particular setup now compared to macOS; as it's basically a glorified streaming device that I interact with through wayvnc/vncviewer out of arm's reach across a table. This also allows me to mostly avoid using the semi-busted Butterfly keyboard.

In addition to having something with security updates again, I'll now never need to think about Apple dropping Intel support. I'd also like to note that nix-darwin support on Intel macOS is ending very soon too - but not Linux + nix as a package manager (nixpkgs) since that combination is separate to macOS + nix-darwin.

Re: About the security content of macOS Tahoe 26.6

#140

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And it's not actually that much information "about the security content". For example: "Impact: An app may be able to access sensitive user data. Description: An access issue was addressed with additional sandbox restrictions." This references CVE-2026-43819, which doesn't have any more information. Compare this with the nearly decade-old https://support.apple.com/en-gb/103680 , and you see much more specific informa…

The vagueness could be intentional. There’s been a big issue with linux where proof of concept exploit code gets posted before the bug is announced because people reverse engineer it from the fix commits. Apple has the advantage that they can keep everything secret for long enough for the patches to roll out. And realistically there is no reason the user needs to know the details of an exploit that was patched before…

> before it was ever used.

But since this is never known, does the user need to know?

Post reply on HN