Cowards. Force them to implement resealable waterproofing
Who is "them"? Everyone making wireless earbuds, because that's who it'd apply to.
Earbuds are fine to exclude. I mean phones
71–72 of 72 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
IMO they entire law should have been target at "replaceable by independent professionals", it is reasonable to require industry standard professional equipment for opening and working on a phone
What makes that reasonable? I can open and repair pretty much any other electronic device in my house if I need to. What makes a phone special?
The difference between the 2 requirements is the level of technical knowledge needed and the necessary investment in tools