How is the Bun rewrite in Rust going?
lockwood.dev
How is the Bun rewrite in Rust going?
1–10 of 412 posts
Re: How is the Bun rewrite in Rust going?
#2Re: How is the Bun rewrite in Rust going?
#3Re: How is the Bun rewrite in Rust going?
#4If you’ve ever worked at a tech company you already know the answer without reading any further
Re: How is the Bun rewrite in Rust going?
#5This is a key problem with LLM exuberance: it's very tempting to trade on decades of experience in software using LLMs, because one is tired of typing and manual figuring-out, it seems to work if you're competent, and the payoff is essentially immediate. The real bill comes in the mail much later.
Re: How is the Bun rewrite in Rust going?
#6Re: How is the Bun rewrite in Rust going?
#7Various people have claimed that Bun in Zig had a lot of tech debt. If they’re to be believed, it seems natural to assume the rewrite does, too. Perhaps all this activity is paying down some of that debt.
Re: How is the Bun rewrite in Rust going?
#8Re: How is the Bun rewrite in Rust going?
#9Author here: An apology on the graphs, they just count rust files touched in commits, not total commits. So if there were two commits and one touched 3 .rs files and another touched 2, it'd be counted as 5 for the purposes of the graphs. I may fix this later but, yeah.
Re: How is the Bun rewrite in Rust going?
#10This post doesn’t make sense. It was rewritten in Rust. The rewrite itself is complete (no more Zig). Various people have claimed that Bun in Zig had a lot of tech debt. If they’re to be believed, it seems natural to assume the rewrite does, too. Perhaps all this activity is paying down some of that debt.
Perhaps. But were that the case, one would think they'd be quite eager to say so.