Live data from Hacker News

Untitled topic

news.ycombinator.com

41–50 of 54 posts

Re: undefined

#41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> if aging didn't seem just natural and the idea of a defeating it didn't seem a bit crazy I can't imagine having this mentality Of course aging is something we will solve - probably within the next 1000 years. We will look back on these times like before humans wore clothes and had language.

I agree, but just look around in this thread and you'll see it.

[dead]

Re: undefined

#42
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[dead]

> Since on 1 hand you got an afterlife, eternity, and what-not. You asked about the existence of God, not the existence of an afterlife. In any case, if there is some sort of afterlife, then eternal material life would impede us as a species because it would prevent attaining it. If there is no afterlife, then eternal material life would impede us as a species by preventing growth and adaptation.

[dead]

Re: undefined

#43

Actually, there was a recent breakthrough that might be the door to open a path to addressing age related degeneration (I’m assuming this is what you mean, not immortality). The enzyme is called CMLase and it prevent the glycoslylation that leads to stiff collagen and aging in the skin. The keys are probably things like preserving cell metabolism, boosting mitochondrial function, preventing telomere shortening, and r…

[dead]

Re: undefined

#46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> if aging didn't seem just natural and the idea of a defeating it didn't seem a bit crazy I can't imagine having this mentality Of course aging is something we will solve - probably within the next 1000 years. We will look back on these times like before humans wore clothes and had language.

> Of course aging is something we will solve - probably within the next 1000 years. I'm imagining you as the son of an Egyptian Pharaoh telling this to his dad. "Really, skip the embalming! If we get you on ice, then they'll be able to revive you by at least 1200 BCE!"

[dead]

Re: undefined

#48
Couldn't you say ageing solved immortality? If nothing makes space for subsequent generations, there is no evolution, so anything that does evolve will outcompete it sooner or later. I (literally) never see any of that acknowledged by people who are upset about mortality, it all seems extremely selfish and short-sighted. Our own life is limited regardless of how long it lasts, so I think the greatest thing about life is that others live, too, and to know it will keep going on. And if immortality was available, the power grabs that already make the world such a shithole would get infinitely worse. There'd be five dudes breeding sex slaves and that's about it.

Re: undefined

#49
What are you even talking about? People have been trying to "solve" aging since forever. You are mad that not every single person is dedicated to this one issue? If it's so bloody easy, why don't you just solve it your damn self?

Re: undefined

#50

we don't solve aging because people like to live in ways that are unhealthy. There is no cure for a sedentary lifestyle or a poor diet.

[dead]

sure, that might happen in a thousand years. But in this or the next century, we will have people living to 150-200 years old age.
Post reply on HN