Harddrive Is Probably Full
41–49 of 49 posts
Re: Harddrive Is Probably Full
#42It's annoying because I'd rather store say family photos than have it full of random junk that means nothing to me. Dunno the answer - better os control? Partition the drive?
Re: Harddrive Is Probably Full
#43Asked Claude to look at my full disk. Thought for 1 minute It found 114GB of Hugging Face models, 17GB worth of models in an obscure app I tested once. In places I would've never thought to look. I'd never have never found these myself. Problem solved. For now!
> I'd never have never found these myself.
You are either the most experienced most incompetent software engineer in the world, or you are lying.
Re: Harddrive Is Probably Full
#44If you're on Windows, WizTree ( https://diskanalyzer.com/ ) is great for figuring out what's consuming your storage space. On Linux/macOS you can use `du` from the command line (or ask an AI to make a convenience wrapper for you).
Re: Harddrive Is Probably Full
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have one single video game I play that takes up around 650GB, so I have a dedicated drive for it. And between 1 and 2 TB of movies, TV, and photos. Everything else is ephemeral/scratch space for whatever I'm working on. I used to be into amateur movie making and editing, and back then I needed many TB of space for the stuff I pulled off my cameras before it got edited down.
What video game!? I've seen games that reach up to the already crazy number of 100gb, but I usually just don't install those, with few exceptions
Re: Harddrive Is Probably Full
#46... and It is ok. I bought 16TB disk because I needed that much storage. If I were using, say, only 10TB, I would be wasting 6TB. I can expand my LVM as much as I can. But I definitely want my disk to be full. Same goes for my RAM. And I want my CPU ide time to stay as close as possible to 0% and my load average as close as possible to my no. of CPUs. Anything else would mean oversizing and overspending.
Re: Harddrive Is Probably Full
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
I just ran it for the first time... I've run windirstat many times including in the last two weeks and yes, this is very fast. According to its timing it took 3.63 seconds to scan my drive... I'm not sure if it really took almost 3 minutes for windirstat, but it did take a long time, so it's plausible. More importantly, ~ 4 seconds is much easier to wait for.
windirstat currently doesn't take 3min to index 500k+ files on an 8x8tb drive raidz2 that's 90% full. When I stopped using windoratat 3ish years ago it took a few minutes to index the same array. I think you might he using an old version, or have an issue with your storage.
It took almost 5 minutes and reports almost 2M items, 1.45M files and 465k subdirs...
I don't know that there's anything wrong with my disk, windirstat has always been slow when I ran it on my windows installation. Since it doesn't cheat, it goes slow. I will say, while it was reading, task manager showed a high read rate and a high write rate, and I dunno why, it's Windows (10); not that going through a convoluted filesystem is particularly fast anywhere else.
Re: Harddrive Is Probably Full
#48... and It is ok. I bought 16TB disk because I needed that much storage. If I were using, say, only 10TB, I would be wasting 6TB. I can expand my LVM as much as I can. But I definitely want my disk to be full. Same goes for my RAM. And I want my CPU ide time to stay as close as possible to 0% and my load average as close as possible to my no. of CPUs. Anything else would mean oversizing and overspending.
Somehow I get the sense that you don't shoot for a balance of $0 in your bank account.