Live data from Hacker News

Third Drone Shot Down in Three Days in Romanian Territory

english.mapn.ro

181–190 of 322 posts

Re: Third Drone Shot Down in Three Days in Romanian Territory

#181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> problem for long Seen the news of the past hours about the 2028 intention?

Trump is 80 years old. He won't be long for this mortal coil, or at least his brain won't (arguably it already isn't).

When has lack of brain activity or even being dead ever stopped them? See also the weird situation with Mitch McConnell.

Re: Third Drone Shot Down in Three Days in Romanian Territory

#182
post #165

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah a solid propaganda arm of the French government

Not the only one though: I remember what happened when we 'invaded' Lybia: not one criticism in the French news anywhere, total censorship, even though our media had widely and correctly criticised the US for the Irak war.. So I think the best thing is to get news from everywhere Russia, China, the US, Europe, but that's a lot of work..

It is also not possible as there is censorship in some cases. The European Union has blocked rt.com.

Re: Third Drone Shot Down in Three Days in Romanian Territory

#183
It's all a sham so that we, Romania, would be dragged into this war. That will only mean the end of the comprador regime currently ruling over us, but until then most probably many of us, Romanian men, will get killed "defending" the Western regime. Such is life, i.e. requiring sacrifices.

Re: Third Drone Shot Down in Three Days in Romanian Territory

#184
post #143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

F-16s with human pilots and a2a missiles vs cheap drones? That’s one hell of an asymmetry and doesn’t seem robust enough to handle 100x the scale.

Yeah, obviously F-16's & humans scale very poorly for this. However: - At one-a-day scale, political and risk considerations probably favor the expensive solution. - Using F-16's reveals nothing about your current anti-drone defenses. (Yeah, it's also a real-world basic competence test for your air force - for better and for worse.) - If your intel people want more data on the drones, an F-16 can haul a whole lotta i…

Ukrainian F-16s have used cannons to shoot down some Russian drones. Cheaper than a missile, but a somewhat risky maneuver as it requires getting close at low altitude and possibly flying through the exploding debris.

https://www.zona-militar.com/en/2026/02/09/ukrainian-f-16am-...

Re: Third Drone Shot Down in Three Days in Romanian Territory

#185

I hope they don’t send any to Bulgaria. Our PM is waiting exactly this to declare we’re joining the Russian federation.

> we’re joining the Russian federation.

Based PM, from one of your neighbors just North of the Danube.

Re: Third Drone Shot Down in Three Days in Romanian Territory

#186
post #90

It's not World War 3. It's just two increasingly overlapping unsolvable wars involving two increasingly coherent geopolitical blocs consisting of dozens of countries spanning three continents, most major nuclear powers holding 95% of global nuclear stockpiles and the vast majority of global military spending and resources, with nuclear-capable cruise, ballistic, and hypersonic missiles flying back and forth, attacks…

Are there enough nations on Russia's side to call them a bloc? It seems like almost everyone is supporting Ukraine.

North Korea is definitely part of the Russian bloc now.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clypr5985ejo

Re: Third Drone Shot Down in Three Days in Romanian Territory

#187
post #101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A "World War" probably isn't characterized by its "size" (whatever that means) but rather by the fact that the combat theatre extends over much of "the world", or that much of "the world" are active belligerents. Ukraine is right now a localized conflict; I don't think it counts. FWIW, as one potential size metric: casualties in Ukraine (so far) are comparable to the Korean or Vietnam War, and an order of magnitude l…

Russia has had more casualties than the UK/US/France combined in WW2

British, American, and French deaths made up only a small fraction of the 60M-75M killed in WWII, which speaks to the global ("World") nature of a World War.

I believe it's also the case that more Vietnamese died during the Vietnam War than the UK/US/France combined during WWII as well.

Re: Third Drone Shot Down in Three Days in Romanian Territory

#188
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it is not owned by the government, rather by the state. In a democracy, how is this a bad thing?

>Since 2008 the channel has been wholly owned by the French government Explain to me why reading news from the state is a good thing? Kinda shocked that people here applaud state-owned media (there is no difference between "government-owned" or "state-owned").

A diversity of media is a good thing. Most of the bad things you could say about state media also apply to sufficiently concentrated private media.

Re: Third Drone Shot Down in Three Days in Romanian Territory

#189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are there enough nations on Russia's side to call them a bloc? It seems like almost everyone is supporting Ukraine.

India and China are both supporting Russia in various overt and covert ways. That's a huge fraction of the world. Iran is even more closely linked. Arguably the real reason for the American attack on Iran is to reduce their contribution to the Ukraine conflict. Plus Russia's various Toadies (which included Hungary, an EU nation, until recently)... It's a pretty sizeable bloc. It's not yet an all out Axis and Allies s…

India and China are the only reasons Russia hasn’t collapsed on itself yet. Much to the detriment of a country that had no interest in being invaded.

Re: Third Drone Shot Down in Three Days in Romanian Territory

#190
post #143
post #38

As part of the SAFE EU financial instrument Romania is spending a lot of cash on defense measures for drones and other armament[1]. Currently still relying heavily on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flakpanzer_Gepard for anti-air as well as fighter jets with air-to-air missiles, as these recent drones were all brought down by F-16s. Aside from strategic targets, a lot of the civilian infrastructure is quite vulnerable…

F-16s with human pilots and a2a missiles vs cheap drones? That’s one hell of an asymmetry and doesn’t seem robust enough to handle 100x the scale.

Yeah, something is preventing them from just putting a small autocannon onto a turret and firing it from a Python script on a laptop. Russian drones and missiles seem to be just straight flying kinds, and while there are reports of Stinger type missiles seen installed on them, there haven't been reports of them growing anti-mortar radars. Most of them shouldn't need guided munitions at all to deal with.
Post reply on HN