[flagged]
Lack of incentive? How about their religion commands it? And that's why it is specifically categorized as Islamic terror rather than generic terror.
Islamist terrorist attack in Berlin Pride event
11–20 of 42 posts
Re: Islamist terrorist attack in Berlin Pride event
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
It hardly ever the other way around. Its no secret that Islamists are responsible for most of the terror attacks in Germany and Europe, and here you are justifying terrorists. There is a reason why China does what it does ;-)
That's factually false. US CSIS data says attacks by non-Islamists account for 85% of total attacks, while attacks by Islamists is just 15%. In Europe, Europol TE-SAT data says it's 59% by non-Islamists vs. 41% by Islamists. Also, I'm not justifying this attack. I'm pointing out the double-standards.
Now do per capita and see that their rate of terror is 10x what it should be. (And that's before readjusting for the undercategorized events being purposefully NOT counted for cultural sympethies)
Re: Islamist terrorist attack in Berlin Pride event
#13[flagged]
> First off, the headline is being heavily editorialized here, rather than using the headline from the article: "Germany classifies Berlin Pride ramming as 'terror attack'" Title is not edited. The German interior minister has announced it as an Islamist terror attack. https://x.com/dw_politics/status/2081381153773097041
[flagged]
Re: Islamist terrorist attack in Berlin Pride event
#14Re: Islamist terrorist attack in Berlin Pride event
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
It hardly ever the other way around. Its no secret that Islamists are responsible for most of the terror attacks in Germany and Europe, and here you are justifying terrorists. There is a reason why China does what it does ;-)
That's factually false. US CSIS data says attacks by non-Islamists account for 85% of total attacks, while attacks by Islamists is just 15%. In Europe, Europol TE-SAT data says it's 59% by non-Islamists vs. 41% by Islamists. Also, I'm not justifying this attack. I'm pointing out the double-standards.
There is an additional aspect to these statistics. Eg a guy set fire to a house last year in Germany, killing four people of turkish descent. They found plenty of nazi paraphernalia in his house, but it was concluded that there was no “right-wing extremist motivation”. So there is a big question of skewed statistics underpinning all of these discussions.
Re: Islamist terrorist attack in Berlin Pride event
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
> First off, the headline is being heavily editorialized here, rather than using the headline from the article: "Germany classifies Berlin Pride ramming as 'terror attack'" Title is not edited. The German interior minister has announced it as an Islamist terror attack. https://x.com/dw_politics/status/2081381153773097041
[flagged]
Nope, it's a live page. DW keeps on changing the title. Also how is it Gaslighting? the fact remains the same.
Re: Islamist terrorist attack in Berlin Pride event
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
You do better and stop deflecting direct attributable harm as something to hide and cover up to prevent indirect harm.
[flagged]
de-escalation doesn't change the facts. It was announced as an islamist terrorist attack as of now and it would still be an islamist terrorist attack even after 10 days.
Re: Islamist terrorist attack in Berlin Pride event
#18[flagged]
How would otherwise you would raise billions of dollars to send to Israel to target and kill Muslims?
Also HN has become and may be run by a right wing white supremacists now. I dare them to post pictures of people running the platform.
Re: Islamist terrorist attack in Berlin Pride event
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
It hardly ever the other way around. Its no secret that Islamists are responsible for most of the terror attacks in Germany and Europe, and here you are justifying terrorists. There is a reason why China does what it does ;-)
That's factually false. US CSIS data says attacks by non-Islamists account for 85% of total attacks, while attacks by Islamists is just 15%. In Europe, Europol TE-SAT data says it's 59% by non-Islamists vs. 41% by Islamists. Also, I'm not justifying this attack. I'm pointing out the double-standards.
>US CSIS data says attacks by non-Islamists account for 85% of total attacks, while attacks by Islamists is just 15%.
"What is per capita?"
Re: Islamist terrorist attack in Berlin Pride event
#20[flagged]
[flagged]