I recently tried Pangram, created an account, wrote a few lines about how my day went, and it was flagged as likely AI-assisted. It clearly doesn't work. It's especially bad that they keep insisting that it works very well, because thousands of people will probably end up falsely accused of AI usage as a result.
Can you share your experiment, so that we can draw our own conclusions? I've been paying for Pangram for a long time and have not seen it misbehave even once. I've seen many people attack it, but when I looked more closely, their claims often evidently boiled down to "I want plausible deniability for my own use of LLMs" - i.e., they were clearly posting AI-generated content on social media and just didn't like the po…
I wouldn't say Pangram is broken, but I would say that it's brittle
11–20 of 45 posts
Re: I wouldn't say Pangram is broken, but I would say that it's brittle
#12I recently tried Pangram, created an account, wrote a few lines about how my day went, and it was flagged as likely AI-assisted. It clearly doesn't work. It's especially bad that they keep insisting that it works very well, because thousands of people will probably end up falsely accused of AI usage as a result.
Can you share your experiment, so that we can draw our own conclusions? I've been paying for Pangram for a long time and have not seen it misbehave even once. I've seen many people attack it, but when I looked more closely, their claims often evidently boiled down to "I want plausible deniability for my own use of LLMs" - i.e., they were clearly posting AI-generated content on social media and just didn't like the po…
Re: I wouldn't say Pangram is broken, but I would say that it's brittle
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you share your experiment, so that we can draw our own conclusions? I've been paying for Pangram for a long time and have not seen it misbehave even once. I've seen many people attack it, but when I looked more closely, their claims often evidently boiled down to "I want plausible deniability for my own use of LLMs" - i.e., they were clearly posting AI-generated content on social media and just didn't like the po…
Read the OP you goofball, there’s examples right there in it.
Re: I wouldn't say Pangram is broken, but I would say that it's brittle
#14Re: I wouldn't say Pangram is broken, but I would say that it's brittle
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you share your experiment, so that we can draw our own conclusions? I've been paying for Pangram for a long time and have not seen it misbehave even once. I've seen many people attack it, but when I looked more closely, their claims often evidently boiled down to "I want plausible deniability for my own use of LLMs" - i.e., they were clearly posting AI-generated content on social media and just didn't like the po…
I think most native English speakers are doing well. The one who will face issues are non native ones. I knew English as my third language since about 10 years but I've only truly become somewhat proficient in it in the past 5 or so years, thus it was heavily influenced by LLMs. So who's at fault for this? Me, for speaking like an LLM simply due to my circumstances? Am I now supposed to learn "human" english?
> I'm Kenyan. I Don't Write Like ChatGPT. ChatGPT Writes Like Me.
> https://marcusolang.substack.com/p/im-kenyan-i-dont-write-li...
HN discussion:
Re: I wouldn't say Pangram is broken, but I would say that it's brittle
#16> If I want to induce a false positive in TSA's airport scanner, I can put a gun-shaped object in my bag. If I want to induce a false positive in Waymo's stop sign detection system, I can paint my own sign and put it up on a pole. Holy strawman-batman, not only does the founder of Pangram not have a proper response to the actual criticisms, he feels the need to completely make up very different situations to try to i…
I'm confused, what are the "actual criticisms" you think weren't responded to?
Re: I wouldn't say Pangram is broken, but I would say that it's brittle
#17Re: I wouldn't say Pangram is broken, but I would say that it's brittle
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
Read the OP you goofball, there’s examples right there in it.
I'm asking the parent about their claim. I already have an opinion about the parent post, in which the author is claiming to have not used an LLM to author a 2025 essay that's illustrated with completely unnecessary AI art. Although one doesn't imply the other, let's say that this diminishes my willingness to believe that claim at face value.
Re: I wouldn't say Pangram is broken, but I would say that it's brittle
#19I recently tried Pangram, created an account, wrote a few lines about how my day went, and it was flagged as likely AI-assisted. It clearly doesn't work. It's especially bad that they keep insisting that it works very well, because thousands of people will probably end up falsely accused of AI usage as a result.
Can you share your experiment, so that we can draw our own conclusions? I've been paying for Pangram for a long time and have not seen it misbehave even once. I've seen many people attack it, but when I looked more closely, their claims often evidently boiled down to "I want plausible deniability for my own use of LLMs" - i.e., they were clearly posting AI-generated content on social media and just didn't like the po…
But I don’t have a license to confirm.
Re: I wouldn't say Pangram is broken, but I would say that it's brittle
#20Even if everyone tacitly agrees Pangram is bullshit, there’s perhaps an opportunity to evolve it into a Yelp-like racket anyway.