11–20 of 52 posts
I was expecting him to read a proper prompt. The prompt would be what he would tell the AI system.
“You are a speech writer, an expert on XYZ… your task is to write ABC…”
It’s not too bad, at least he is using ai. And agree we can replace many of them with AI. At least we will have the opportunity to talk to the ai directly about concerns.
politicians are one of the easiest jobs to replace with AI
To be technical, what he read wasn't prompt, it's part of the AI's response to the prompt. But yes, it's a giant tell that politician used AI to write his speech, and he didn't thoroughly edit the response when preparing the final draft.
The staff used an LLM and did not bother to check (or got their check wrong.)
One of them is guilty, the other one is responsible, the conséquence should be in proportion to the gravity.
Why exactly is that bad?
Why exactly is that bad?
This is bad because it's only getting harder to trust people. This is not someone I would want representing me. Although I'm not thrilled about any of my representatives anyway.
* AI Response. Not prompt. I was expecting him to read a proper prompt. The prompt would be what he would tell the AI system. “You are a speech writer, an expert on XYZ… your task is to write ABC…” It’s not too bad, at least he is using ai. And agree we can replace many of them with AI. At least we will have the opportunity to talk to the ai directly about concerns.
What is not too bad about him using "AI", exactly?
politicians are one of the easiest jobs to replace with AI
I really hope you’re joking, but it’s hard to tell on here!
politicians are one of the easiest jobs to replace with AI
Why exactly is that bad?