141–150 of 337 posts
Why Kimi? because K3 is the only frontier model I can have a serious conversation with about my product's security.
(I did apply for OpenAi's Cyber Pilot but got no response)
I wonder why Apple stayed absent from signing this?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
NVIDIA sells the tools. The more the better it is for them. Microsoft and Meta are also-rans at this point. Their best hope of catching up is probably leveraging their infra and open models.
"leveraging their infra" is a pretty solid play, considering the scope of investments these two companies have made thus far.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They are worried about OpenAI and Anthropic making their own processors and controlling the whole stack is my guess.
They really don't need to be very worried about that. Google, Microsoft, Amazon, et al have decades of experience in shipping custom hardware at scale, and it is not a simple field to pivot into
The other thing that comes to mind is they want to avoid the government from banning open models as has been suggested by some of the closed models providers.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Makes sense Microsoft is placing it self as a model host and os providing open weight models for much cheaper on their infra already. No wonder openai and anthropic are terrified
Makes sense for Microsoft. Copilot is already capable of being model agnostic (both GH Copilot, obviously, and M365 as well). They're an enterprise software & services company, they want to sell integrated AI tooling in their stack, powered by whatever models their customers want rather than any specific model. Models are quickly becoming a dumb pipe, like an ISP. Just a commodity. The labs should rightfully be terri…
I wonder what is happening behind closed doors for these companies to be issuing such a joint letter.
If I were cynical, I'd say it isn't helped by the current US administration.
I wonder what is happening behind closed doors for these companies to be issuing such a joint letter.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
And the verdict is still out on if it's going to be cheaper than employees in the long run. Maybe for companies in HCoL areas (SV/NYC), but any smaller mid-market org in a LCoL area, frontier model token spend may not end up all that cheaper when your employee salaries are $55k-$75k/year so you're mostly evaluating it as an additional force multiplier expense rather than a headcount replacer.
Those salaries seem low for mid sized cities even no?
> The unbearable cheapness of open weight models So the closed model try to get client with their model by saying it's cheaper than employees, and then turn around to lawyer-out cheaper alternative? Truly the american dream.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
And the verdict is still out on if it's going to be cheaper than employees in the long run. Maybe for companies in HCoL areas (SV/NYC), but any smaller mid-market org in a LCoL area, frontier model token spend may not end up all that cheaper when your employee salaries are $55k-$75k/year so you're mostly evaluating it as an additional force multiplier expense rather than a headcount replacer.
Those salaries seem low for mid sized cities even no?