Earlier quoted context omitted.
"no actually I mean freedom for the things most people like"?
I mean freedom that doesn’t violate other people’s freedoms, like your CSAM example.
Drawn CSAM doesn't violate anyone's freedoms.
I regret migrating to Codeberg
511–520 of 617 posts
Re: I regret migrating to Codeberg
#512Earlier quoted context omitted.
It isn't, I'm literally not allowed to host a project on it, knowing obviously it's 100% "LLM-made" nowadays, no modern softwares can be hosted on it, Bun can't be hosted on it (100% "AI" now), you don't find it ridiculous? The world is changing, they don't want to acknowledge it. The cryptocurrency related projects ban is also insane knowing how much it has contributed to having greater crypto librairies, including…
Just ask your AI to set up a website called Vibeberg for AI projects only. It should be really simple.
It has nothing to do with "vibe coding" in the sense you imply, you see the ARC-AGI, DeepSWE benchmarks and so-on, assume that will be 99.9% soon when we have Opus 9 which will be soon, which means in practice that most SWE are beaten by top models, which means that letting humans code will be more dangerous (and inferior) than letting models code, we are already close to that which is why we must change the way we work now, not the moment it comes.
It's already dangerous today to not review codebases by top models, how do you think that will be in 2028?
And yes, a simple combination of top models today in adversarial+loops... and only 20 subscriptions will do much better than Codeberg ($100K monthly token equivalent).
But sure, Codeberg can remain alive for all the legacy stuff, but imo the mentality is quite backward.
Re: I regret migrating to Codeberg
#513Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's absolutely Codeberg's right to do this, but I only wish that they had been more clear about this earlier, because now I have to move all my repos to my own forge. I also do consider it to be extremely disappointing that my FOSS projects under approved licences are not welcome because they don't have a community, even if they are taking only hundreds of kilobytes of disk space and bandwidth. Codeberg's website cu…
I do not believe they will kick off a serious project that only uses hundreds of kilobytes just because it isn't big yet . I believe they are saying they don't want things like dotfiles repos (unless many people are using your dotfiles) or one-off scripts. The rules are not for interpretation by a computer program - they are a BDFL trying to communicate what he likes and doesn't like.
Funnily enough, my dotfiles were actually one of the things I was storing on Codeberg! Still, it's Codeberg's platform and it's their choice, but I absolutely will not host my repos on a platform whose BDFL can wake up and decide they're not welcome. At least I can sleep mostly peacefully hosting these things on my own forge.
Re: I regret migrating to Codeberg
#514Earlier quoted context omitted.
I mean freedom that doesn’t violate other people’s freedoms, like your CSAM example.
Drawn CSAM doesn't violate anyone's freedoms.
I feel like that’s a personal topic with you and the idea that someone draws some content and somehow certifies “it’s ok” has plenty of obvious issues unrelated to the topic.
Re: I regret migrating to Codeberg
#515Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just ask your AI to set up a website called Vibeberg for AI projects only. It should be really simple.
It has nothing to do with "vibe coding" in the sense you imply, you see the ARC-AGI, DeepSWE benchmarks and so-on, assume that will be 99.9% soon when we have Opus 9 which will be soon, which means in practice that most SWE are beaten by top models, which means that letting humans code will be more dangerous (and inferior) than letting models code, we are already close to that which is why we must change the way we w…
This comment is full of both a lot of hyperbole and theoretical outcomes that Idk even where to begin. There for one is no guarantee that Anthropic will remain around long enough for them to get to Opus 9 let alone a better model for one. The same could be said for OAI.
And again, what is the problem with a platform wanting to not be flooded with a bunch of low-quality code that gets abandoned after it's done what the creator wanted it to do? I keep seeing this claim of these models being better than "most" developers but have yet to see any actual statistics cited to back up this claim which makes me think it's all just vibes.
Re: I regret migrating to Codeberg
#516Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just ask your AI to set up a website called Vibeberg for AI projects only. It should be really simple.
It has nothing to do with "vibe coding" in the sense you imply, you see the ARC-AGI, DeepSWE benchmarks and so-on, assume that will be 99.9% soon when we have Opus 9 which will be soon, which means in practice that most SWE are beaten by top models, which means that letting humans code will be more dangerous (and inferior) than letting models code, we are already close to that which is why we must change the way we w…
Just start up Vibeberg and forget about Codeberg entirely. It's obsolete, an ancient relic. Vibe ahead!
Re: I regret migrating to Codeberg
#517Earlier quoted context omitted.
It has nothing to do with "vibe coding" in the sense you imply, you see the ARC-AGI, DeepSWE benchmarks and so-on, assume that will be 99.9% soon when we have Opus 9 which will be soon, which means in practice that most SWE are beaten by top models, which means that letting humans code will be more dangerous (and inferior) than letting models code, we are already close to that which is why we must change the way we w…
This comment is full of both a lot of hyperbole and theoretical outcomes that Idk even where to begin. There for one is no guarantee that Anthropic will remain around long enough for them to get to Opus 9 let alone a better model for one. The same could be said for OAI. And again, what is the problem with a platform wanting to not be flooded with a bunch of low-quality code that gets abandoned after it's done what th…
It's not low-quality code, that's the thing, yes, you can do trash, like most humans do, but it can also output better code, consistency... than most humans today, what will it be next year?
Anthropic isn't going away, even if they do, a lot will compete anyway, AI in a general sense will reach the point where our jobs as dev will be to prompt all day long and that's it. It's almost sure that we will keep having better models and tooling, right now every single month it's getting better and better, and on some aspects not just linearly.
the moment GPT-3.5 dropped, it was already not hard to picture literally what we do today, the "hmm what if THIS suddenly is actually accurate", and tomorrow, it will be all the pain points we currently have that are solved.
Genuinely, see the Bun porting? Imagine that is with a very "weak" model, weak tooling, weak hardware, now imagine that tomorrow, it will port it 50x faster, more performant, better consistency, docs, and virtually zero bugs: not hard to picture at all, it's what it will be imo in 1 year, 2 tops just if the current pace continue, that's not even accounting for the thousand of new companies coming, can we really say it's vibe trash when it outperforms humans?
Think of what's slowing you down today and why you aren't already a Bot typing non-stop and imagine those solved, now what?
I must add Kimi K3 as another example, nothing "wahou" with it in the sense that it was already a sure thing, it's so great to see it coming already, but it's also sure we will have Mythos 10 level open-source, open-weight in a few years, it won't be surprising I mean, it's just logical. We will also have Marvel-level movies done with a prompt.
PS: sorry it's all over the place and out of touch with the initial Codeberg thing
Re: I regret migrating to Codeberg
#518Earlier quoted context omitted.
It has nothing to do with "vibe coding" in the sense you imply, you see the ARC-AGI, DeepSWE benchmarks and so-on, assume that will be 99.9% soon when we have Opus 9 which will be soon, which means in practice that most SWE are beaten by top models, which means that letting humans code will be more dangerous (and inferior) than letting models code, we are already close to that which is why we must change the way we w…
Just start up Vibeberg and forget about Codeberg entirely. It's obsolete, an ancient relic. Vibe ahead!
We've already forgotten about Codeberg since the announcement, done, vibed :)
Re: I regret migrating to Codeberg
#519Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Does that mean codeberg has just guaranteed its own demise? In industry, certainly. The free-because-it's-a-hobby crowd will still be well served by Codeberg. Much like how you can get very cheap mass-manufactured furniture, but some people still build their own tables and chairs.
The analogy doesn't work so well for software because it's freely replicable
> The analogy doesn't work so well for software because it's freely replicable
The acquisition cost is not relevant. Many people who can afford furniture still make their own. Many people who get free furniture break it down and make something else with it.