Sounds cool. What should we call the magit equivalent for got? Magot? Maggot?
Game of Trees – Git-based version control from OpenBSD folks
11–13 of 13 posts
Re: Game of Trees – Git-based version control from OpenBSD folks
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
The goals page also implies it is intended to adapt to more OpenBSD filesystem permissions model things, which aren't as important in Linux or cross-platform development (git's intended environments).
i assume you are talking about the things mentioned here: https://www.gameoftrees.org/comparison.html more applications making use of linux capabilities to restrict access would be nice though.
> Consistently use pledge(2) and unveil(2) across the code base.
Both link to man pages that seem rather OpenBSD-specific to me. Seems an interesting requirement/goal, but I'm afraid I don't know enough OpenBSD-specifics to know much more about why this is a goal or what the project gains from having it as a goal even if I can appreciate it as a goal that certainly seems unlikely to upstream into git itself.
(ETA: Which yeah, it does seem like the Comparisons page includes some of that reasoning, but not well enough I caught on first skim and I'm still not sure I understand it on second reading, but interesting.)
Re: Game of Trees – Git-based version control from OpenBSD folks
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
i assume you are talking about the things mentioned here: https://www.gameoftrees.org/comparison.html more applications making use of linux capabilities to restrict access would be nice though.
I was reading more into this specific in the project goals: > Consistently use pledge(2) and unveil(2) across the code base. Both link to man pages that seem rather OpenBSD-specific to me. Seems an interesting requirement/goal, but I'm afraid I don't know enough OpenBSD-specifics to know much more about why this is a goal or what the project gains from having it as a goal even if I can appreciate it as a goal that ce…