[stub for offtopicness] [Submitted title was "As of JDK 27, Oracle engineers will thus stop maintaining the macOS/x64 port", which is a quote from the article, but was a bit confusing in the title]
JEP 541: Deprecate the macOS/x64 Port for Removal
31–40 of 99 posts
Re: JEP 541: Deprecate the macOS/x64 Port for Removal
#32Wasn't Java once a "write once, run everywhere"? Not that this affects me personally (I use Linux primarily; and have a Win10 machine for testing on my left hand side here), but it seems strange that Oracle supports fewer operating systems rather than more. Perhaps Oracle aims for a windows11-only Java version ... where everyone must verify his or her age.
Well, the Latin word for "left" is "sinister", so that tracks.
Re: JEP 541: Deprecate the macOS/x64 Port for Removal
#33[stub for offtopicness] [Submitted title was "As of JDK 27, Oracle engineers will thus stop maintaining the macOS/x64 port", which is a quote from the article, but was a bit confusing in the title]
Ten minutes later, I'm still trying to figure out the role of "thus" in this headline.
Re: JEP 541: Deprecate the macOS/x64 Port for Removal
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why? I can upgrade, that's not a problem. I'm just saying macOS works fine so far, almost all of the software works too. But I see increasing amount of announcements like this one suggesting that I'll have to replace hardware to get the latest versions. So I guess I will do that only to be able to use that software, not to get better performance.
Well Apple isn't making amd64 systems anymore, so software support will naturally start to waver.
Re: JEP 541: Deprecate the macOS/x64 Port for Removal
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
This keeps getting posted and is not true. Rosetta is still present and working. It throws a deprecation warning notice but otherwise runs fine. It's macOS 28 that will no longer run x86_64 apps, although games are exempt. Rosetta is basically going game only at that point. They haven't announced how long it will keep working in this capacity.
Have they announced how they’re going to make it game only? A whitelist based on a hash of the executable? That seems cumbersome.
Re: JEP 541: Deprecate the macOS/x64 Port for Removal
#36Re: JEP 541: Deprecate the macOS/x64 Port for Removal
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you run Linux?
Why? I can upgrade, that's not a problem. I'm just saying macOS works fine so far, almost all of the software works too. But I see increasing amount of announcements like this one suggesting that I'll have to replace hardware to get the latest versions. So I guess I will do that only to be able to use that software, not to get better performance.
Or switch software. Windows will run via Boot Camp and depending on your hardware Linux might work too.
Re: JEP 541: Deprecate the macOS/x64 Port for Removal
#38People said AI was going to replace all programmers, yet AI can't even maintain a x64 macOS port of Java.
Re: JEP 541: Deprecate the macOS/x64 Port for Removal
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you run Linux?
Why? I can upgrade, that's not a problem. I'm just saying macOS works fine so far, almost all of the software works too. But I see increasing amount of announcements like this one suggesting that I'll have to replace hardware to get the latest versions. So I guess I will do that only to be able to use that software, not to get better performance.
Re: JEP 541: Deprecate the macOS/x64 Port for Removal
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
Browsers stopped reporting "real" user agents a long time ago as fingerprinting protection.
Firefox reports correctly.
PS: and on my Win11 machine Firefox says that I'm on 'Windows NT 10.0', which AFAIK is the same NT version that was also reported on Win10.