https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5 - A blog post for those not wanting to go through a 190ish page pdf
I like how they highlighted Opus 5 as the best for “Agentic Coding” even though the number is slightly lower than Fable. Close enough for marketing, I guess!
Claude Opus 5
111–120 of 1001 posts
Re: Claude Opus 5
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
Funny that a company selling an AI software developer can't use it to fix their infra. Fixing those issues still requires humans.
How many companies at the size of Anthropic can serve the amount of traffic and manage the amount of compute they have?
Re: Claude Opus 5
#113> Opus 5’s safeguards match those of Claude Fable 5’s, with one change: it now permits source-code vulnerability discovery at all access levels. This means that the model can support defensive cybersecurity work while still blocking vulnerability discovery in compiled binaries, which is more commonly used offensively. Okay so it’s worse than Opus 4.8 for my purposes I guess?
Presumably it drops back to 4.8 in those cases so it's not really worse
Re: Claude Opus 5
#114https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5 - A blog post for those not wanting to go through a 190ish page pdf
I like how they highlighted Opus 5 as the best for “Agentic Coding” even though the number is slightly lower than Fable. Close enough for marketing, I guess!
Re: Claude Opus 5
#115Earlier quoted context omitted.
Funny that a company selling an AI software developer can't use it to fix their infra. Fixing those issues still requires humans.
How many companies at the size of Anthropic can serve the amount of traffic and manage the amount of compute they have?
Re: Claude Opus 5
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
I like how they highlighted Opus 5 as the best for “Agentic Coding” even though the number is slightly lower than Fable. Close enough for marketing, I guess!
Best can describe multiple things. Almost as good for half the cost is something I'm very comfortable describing that way.
Re: Claude Opus 5
#117https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5 - A blog post for those not wanting to go through a 190ish page pdf
I like how they highlighted Opus 5 as the best for “Agentic Coding” even though the number is slightly lower than Fable. Close enough for marketing, I guess!
Re: Claude Opus 5
#118Re: Claude Opus 5
#119Not that they should get credit for giving you only 50% of your plan worth of Fable usage but still.
Re: Claude Opus 5
#120Isn’t it just hilarious that a model that seemed so superior to Fable but didn't get doomsay marketing from Anthropic got released without any issues? In theory, this was supposed to be AGI level according to Anthropic, yet here we are, just a normal Friday.