Earlier quoted context omitted.
> people only look at the form and ignore the substance of the content. This is largely because most people are incapable of thinking critically and evaluating substance. So they regress to indirect markers of good writing, and the whole thing becomes a game of signaling. The rot is so deep, many popular resources on writing focus more on style and presentation than focusing on the substance of writing. And even when…
> This is largely because most people are incapable of thinking critically and evaluating substance. No, with AI it's because it's MUCH faster than evaluating substance, and fast ways to weed out AI slop are desparately needed, since it can be produced so quickly.
It's the thing it was trained to do. The entire decades-old architecture has exited for specifically that purpose. That second "L" in "LLM" is "language" for a reason.