Scary stuff from one of the winners: "A Taxonomy of Omnicidal Futures Involving Artificial Intelligence" (Jacob Tsimerman, Andrew Critch) https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.09369
Fields Medals 2026
91–100 of 128 posts
Re: Fields Medals 2026
#92Re: Fields Medals 2026
#93Scary stuff from one of the winners: "A Taxonomy of Omnicidal Futures Involving Artificial Intelligence" (Jacob Tsimerman, Andrew Critch) https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.09369
Re: Fields Medals 2026
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
My experience talking with high level mathematicians is that they tend to know their subjects so well and are so excited to share it that they can and will scale their explanation to match their audience.
I mean, they likely have practice! Dating or maybe a significant other, parents, siblings, any BBQ event IE any social event outside academia where someone asks "So what do you do?"
Yes we do have plenty of practice adjusting our explanations to the audience.
Re: Fields Medals 2026
#95Hackernews: Next time it'll all be LLMs. AI's going to kill us all, though, one of the mathematicians said so! Maths is useless anyway, what a bunch of nerds. Ooh, one of them likes lesbian fanfic.
Re: Fields Medals 2026
#96Earlier quoted context omitted.
But it's not the same thing. I went through this conversation between Terry Tao and ChatGPT about the Jacobian Conjecture counterexample [0] and it looks a lot more like a conversation between peers than him using a tool. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49010345
Well, how many humans do you think are able to prompt this to the LLM? "The homogeneity in x is an intertwining between a dilation (x,r,u) to (lambda x, r,u) and a dilation (P,Q,R) to (lambda^-2 P, lambda^-1 Q, lambda R) which seems to collapse the 3d jacobian to a sort of twisted 2d jacobian. Is there a general theory of such twisted jacobians and do you have any sense why those particular dilation weights were used…
This happened because Rudi was persistent and Einstein was kind enough.
In future, citizen scientists have a chance to work on their ideas using AI, eventhough they don't have the deep domain skills. Of course, an expert would still need to review it as usual. But it is a useful tool to democratize science further.
https://www.sciencenews.org/blog/context/amateur-who-helped-...
Re: Fields Medals 2026
#97Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is this a purely hypothetical question? Or are you saying that’s what happened in this case. Because that’s not the way I understand it.
It's not, it's basically something that happened. One unsolved problem was solved with the only human input being telling LLM to work harder and to actually solve it after few failed attempts.
https://chatgpt.com/share/6a60b2eb-0b64-83ee-9c76-7931ca1de0...
Re: Fields Medals 2026
#98Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is this supposed to imply that it's accessible?
Yes - as in you have thousands, if not tens of thousands of folks around the world who can understand the general ideas of what was worked on.
Re: Fields Medals 2026
#99Yu Deng is more famous now in china because he loves Lesbian fan fiction.