If coding has been solved, why does software keep getting worse?
1–10 of 719 posts
Re: If coding has been solved, why does software keep getting worse?
#2Re: If coding has been solved, why does software keep getting worse?
#3The smaller the org, the better the chances of having only reasonable levels of misalignment... but without taking on high risk, it's just better pat to work on a large, worse org. Frustrating.
Re: If coding has been solved, why does software keep getting worse?
#4I remember noticing the same thing a decade ago. I don't think it has anything to do with AI.
Running non free software is essentially giving up our freedom. Before internet connectivity the problem wasn't too bad but nowadays there is always the temptation to squeeze the lusers.
Re: If coding has been solved, why does software keep getting worse?
#5If you're making a Linux distro, please don't do this. I will not watch your video. I was interested, and now I'm not.
Re: If coding has been solved, why does software keep getting worse?
#6Imo we know the tools (social, + technical) to make good software that works. But in the face of massive complexity, people just want the next feature, the next thing sales can use as a win
And yeah I agree with the other commenter here - I don't think this is AI. We had terrible software before, even declining quality.
Re: If coding has been solved, why does software keep getting worse?
#7Re: If coding has been solved, why does software keep getting worse?
#8Just a little gripe, but near the end of the article he links to a site for something called "Omarchy" which appears to be a Linux distribution. If you click on the link, the only information available is in the form of a video. If you're making a Linux distro, please don't do this. I will not watch your video. I was interested, and now I'm not.
Re: If coding has been solved, why does software keep getting worse?
#9Re: If coding has been solved, why does software keep getting worse?
#10I work in mediation and have recently seen a few cases where I’ve wondered if the participants were suffering from AI psychosis as related to their claims: where they’d constructed their legal cases hand-in-hand with an LLM and had become absolutely convinced despite a contestable set of facts.
People have always been subject to delusion, but in these cases, all documentation submitted was obviously created by chatbots.