I love this UI, so here is my attempt to re-create this using ImGUI
98.css
111–120 of 141 posts
Re: 98.css
#112This one is pretty good, but it has one common flaw that other implementations have: lots of empty space between controls. Win95/98 was very efficient in this area. Too much empty space wastes the space.
Totally agree and I think the root cause are today's larger screen sizes, less constraints. Win95 was designed at a time when 800x600 and 1024x768 have been the standards to work with.
Re: 98.css
#113Popular in 2024 (471 points, 93 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42056918 2022 (606 points, 182 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33310554 2020 (838 points, 211 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22940564
last time this came up people appreciated my collection https://alexbsoft.github.io/win95.css/ windows 95 https://bootstra386.com/ 1980's websites https://botoxparty.github.io/XP.css/ windows xp https://code.divshot.com/geo-bootstrap/ geocities https://cs16.samke.me/ counter strike 1.6 https://edwardtufte.github.io/tufte-css/ edward tufte https://jdan.github.io/98.css/ windows 98 https://khang-nd.github.io/7.css/ win…
and don't forget Windows 93! https://www.windows93.net
Re: 98.css
#114Something that always irked me about 98.css and its friends was the ever-so-slightly-incorrect version of MS Sans Serif.
Finally decided to do something about it: https://github.com/jdan/98.css/pull/230
Re: 98.css
#115[dead]
Re: 98.css
#116[dead]
Re: 98.css
#117This is neat for all Windows fans. Has anyone done the same for OSF/MOTIF?
Edit: Relying on my memory, the CDE style at https://nielssp.github.io/classic-stylesheets/ comes pretty close!
Re: 98.css
#118Looks terrible on my machine. Something wrong with the font. And button press animation is too slow and annoying.
Re: 98.css
#119Why isn’t all the text in the Microsoft font?
Re: 98.css
#120Better interface than the current Windows UI.