Live data from Hacker News

The evolutionary role of cooking

economist.com

1–10 of 32 posts

Re: The evolutionary role of cooking

#2
Stating cooking "underpins all other [human evolutionary changes]" sounds interesting if corroborated. I perused the web for some more information on Richard Wrangham's research. Wikipedia provided this:

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=cooking-up-bigger-brains

http://artsci.wustl.edu/~hpontzer/Courses/Wrangham&Conkl...

...and the evidence points against him. Fire doesn't appear to have been controlled until far after Wangham assests. Not only, but:

The mainstream view among anthropologists is that the increase in human brain-size was due to a shift away from the consumption of nuts and berries to the consumption of meat.

makes more sense. The transition from primitive food sources (nuts, berries -- chimp food now) may have catalyzed the transition to a regular high-calorie diet. Take this article with a juicy fliet mignon, topped with a generous helping of salt.

Re: The evolutionary role of cooking

#5
post #4
post #3

"he thinks that cooking and other forms of preparing food are humanity’s “killer app" Am I the only one that thought killer app was only used in reference to web/technology platforms :)

This is called an analogy.

I know. I just found the analogy interesting, since I didn't think the killer app term was mainstream.

Re: The evolutionary role of cooking

#7
post #2

Stating cooking "underpins all other [human evolutionary changes]" sounds interesting if corroborated . I perused the web for some more information on Richard Wrangham's research. Wikipedia provided this: http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=cooking-up-bigger-brains http://artsci.wustl.edu/~hpontzer/Courses/Wrangham&Conkl... ...and the evidence points against him. Fire doesn't appear to have been controlled until far…

Both the linked article and the sci-am article show that this is hardly a settled matter either way, and that Wrangham's thesis isn't unreasonable.

Re: The evolutionary role of cooking

#8
post #2

Stating cooking "underpins all other [human evolutionary changes]" sounds interesting if corroborated . I perused the web for some more information on Richard Wrangham's research. Wikipedia provided this: http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=cooking-up-bigger-brains http://artsci.wustl.edu/~hpontzer/Courses/Wrangham&Conkl... ...and the evidence points against him. Fire doesn't appear to have been controlled until far…

Both the linked article and the sci-am article show that this is hardly a settled matter either way, and that Wrangham's thesis isn't unreasonable.

Right. I'm of the opinion that human evolution was influenced by a combination of these two factors, in addition to many others. However, given the evidence, I do not think that cooking is the preeminent contributor to cognitive/human/metabolic development.

Re: The evolutionary role of cooking

#9
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Both the linked article and the sci-am article show that this is hardly a settled matter either way, and that Wrangham's thesis isn't unreasonable.

Right. I'm of the opinion that human evolution was influenced by a combination of these two factors, in addition to many others. However, given the evidence, I do not think that cooking is the preeminent contributor to cognitive/human/metabolic development.

This qualified opinion should have been your original comment.

Re: The evolutionary role of cooking

#10
post #3

"he thinks that cooking and other forms of preparing food are humanity’s “killer app" Am I the only one that thought killer app was only used in reference to web/technology platforms :)

No, "killer app" is only used in reference to spreadsheets! :-) Learn your history and think VisiCalc. http://hubpages.com/hub/VisiCalc--the-First-Killer-App-of-th...
Post reply on HN