Live data from Hacker News

Couple pay >$800k for a gene-editing therapy for their daughter. She died.

science.org

41–50 of 248 posts

Re: Couple pay >$800k for a gene-editing therapy for their daughter. She died.

#41
post #2

There's so many ethical problems with the events as described in the article. The worst to me seems to be that the researchers/doctors seem to have downplayed the risks here. Which for a never before tried gene therapy that is meant to work inside the brain are absolutely enormous. The ethical issues around the money seem minor in comparison with that and the fact that they seem to have ignored similar side effects i…

I’m very puzzled why this wasn’t replicated in eg a study in rats first (where you duplicate the mutation, and then attempt to cure it).

[deleted]

Re: Couple pay >$800k for a gene-editing therapy for their daughter. She died.

#42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Treat those proses as warnings. They mean the writers have decided to guide your emotions in certain direction instead of portraying what happened in a neutral tone.

They're writing about a child that died, I don't think they hav any other motive other than the reader to feel sadness or outrage and given it is a dead child, they should not.

[deleted]

Re: Couple pay >$800k for a gene-editing therapy for their daughter. She died.

#43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It says so much about how our society treats the neurodivergent that it's considered a non-extreme opinion that a dead child is preferable to an autistic one.

That's not what happened here. The team was too ambitious and not careful enough but they were not trying to kill the child. I just don't think there is any reason to put that additional context into what happened here.

I think what OP was trying to ask was why would a parent be willing to put their child at lethal risk, using an experimental treatment, for a condition that itself is not lethal? I don't have a kid with autism or a learning disability so I don't know how I'd handle it, but if I did, I'd probably choose to live with it and help the child make the best of it. I would not be reaching for someone's research project.

Re: Couple pay >$800k for a gene-editing therapy for their daughter. She died.

#44
post #18

> When Mei was 4, one of her kindergarten teachers pulled Linda aside: Mei didn’t draw or write as well as the other kids and her language skills weren’t developing normally. Her mother might want to get her evaluated, the teacher said. In March 2023, Mei was diagnosed with global developmental delay, a broad label with many causes. Specialists explained that some of Mei’s behaviors—the funny sounds she liked to make…

It says so much about how our society treats the neurodivergent that it's considered a non-extreme opinion that a dead child is preferable to an autistic one.

Pretty sure the parents weren’t expecting a 50-50 shot of cure vs death. The medical staff downplaying risk and ignoring issues seems like the bigger problem especially for a developmental procedure. If they represented the risk as 1 in 10000 I would probably take those odds. If the actual risk was 1 in 5 and they didn’t convey that it’s pretty messed up.

Getting in your car has risk, so does riding a bike. They shouldn’t be coin flips.

Re: Couple pay >$800k for a gene-editing therapy for their daughter. She died.

#45
post #8

> The paper had an enthusiastic reception. “These promising results might pave the way for the development of an effective clinical treatment,” Kevin Bender, a neuroscientist at UC San Francisco, wrote in an accompanying commentary. At the time, Bender had no idea that a girl had received it and was already dead. Meanwhile, Chinese state media, CCTV, called the work “the first ray of hope” for “countless families suf…

Sounds extremely similar to the first victims of Macchiarini. He and his entourage were writing and publishing success stories about his experiments when the victims had already died.

Re: Couple pay >$800k for a gene-editing therapy for their daughter. She died.

#46
post #18

> When Mei was 4, one of her kindergarten teachers pulled Linda aside: Mei didn’t draw or write as well as the other kids and her language skills weren’t developing normally. Her mother might want to get her evaluated, the teacher said. In March 2023, Mei was diagnosed with global developmental delay, a broad label with many causes. Specialists explained that some of Mei’s behaviors—the funny sounds she liked to make…

It says so much about how our society treats the neurodivergent that it's considered a non-extreme opinion that a dead child is preferable to an autistic one.

Neurodivergency, or whatever you might call it, sucks, at least during childhood. Ten times so in a family-centered society. I had a mild enough case to grow up functional and independent, but if not for that… I totally see how one might chose a risky treatment even when fully informed. The problem here, it looks like the consent was nowhere informed enough, and the research team chose not to publish the case after it turned out a failure.

Re: Couple pay >$800k for a gene-editing therapy for their daughter. She died.

#47
This is a tragic story. But it is also a story about the lengths that parents in China will go to improve the quality of life for their only child or to "save face" to their social circle about how their child is performing relative to others.

It's quite tragic that they felt the need to lean into this treatment and quite tragic that they were led on. Just a sad story all around.

Re: Couple pay >$800k for a gene-editing therapy for their daughter. She died.

#48

An article about the complicated issue that is a child with a non-lethal developmental disorder getting a treatment that ends with the tragedy of the headline. The article might be sensationalizing the situation, but it makes the doctor out like a monster and as the facts read I can't say I disagree. That the treatment was inconclusive in the animal studies isn't particularly shocking. The brain is one of the more co…

> It really sounds like cutting edge biotech has ethics get ignored when money and fame are on the table.

Wouldn't be the first time. Nor the first time the actual evidence of effectiveness of the treatment (i.e. even when working as intended) was ignored.

Re: Couple pay >$800k for a gene-editing therapy for their daughter. She died.

#49

An article about the complicated issue that is a child with a non-lethal developmental disorder getting a treatment that ends with the tragedy of the headline. The article might be sensationalizing the situation, but it makes the doctor out like a monster and as the facts read I can't say I disagree. That the treatment was inconclusive in the animal studies isn't particularly shocking. The brain is one of the more co…

> The number of things being found with hindsight remind me of "move fast and break things" development.

It is the same mentality in all of business rn, everyone is ruthless and doesn’t give a single fuck about consequences because they won’t be coming for another 2 years at least and people have a short memory

Post reply on HN