Show HN: Claude-thermos keeps your Claude session warm for you
11–20 of 91 posts
Don't we pay for cache input though?
Re: Show HN: Claude-thermos keeps your Claude session warm for you
#12Glad this exists. It will force anthropic to fix their flawed cache mechanism.
Re: Show HN: Claude-thermos keeps your Claude session warm for you
#13Re: Show HN: Claude-thermos keeps your Claude session warm for you
#14Is the 5-minute expiration correct? I thought it was more like ~1 hour.
You can set the retention globally (whole session) to 1 hour which will actually make it more expensive. The default is 5 minutes.
*UPD:* actually it appears the default is authentication-dependent. API key gets 5 minutes, subscriptions - 1 hour.
Re: Show HN: Claude-thermos keeps your Claude session warm for you
#15Re: Show HN: Claude-thermos keeps your Claude session warm for you
#16Don't we pay for cache input though?
The idea is this keeps it in cache so you don’t have to pay to re-input.
Re: Show HN: Claude-thermos keeps your Claude session warm for you
#17Glad this exists. It will force anthropic to fix their flawed cache mechanism.
How should they fix it?
Re: Show HN: Claude-thermos keeps your Claude session warm for you
#18I've directly inspected calls for pro/Max plans and as of today they have 1hr cache expiries. This has definitely degraded to 5 min in the past but that's the behavior today. If you're paying API rates, you can choose 5m or 1hr yourself (and pay different rates). Keeping a 1hr cache warm could still be useful, sure, but outside that, I don't see much use of this today.
When using API keys the default is still 5 minutes. Setting 1 hour for the entire session is actually a lot more wasteful considering the 2x rate that it comes with
Re: Show HN: Claude-thermos keeps your Claude session warm for you
#19Don't we pay for cache input though?
You can send and receive 1 byte and refresh the cache. Keeping the cache alive isn't free, but it's close.
Re: Show HN: Claude-thermos keeps your Claude session warm for you
#20How will this not lead to tragedy of the commons?