Earlier quoted context omitted.
I also wonder how Nostr is useful here. The central idea of Nostr is that it's a lot harder to deplatform people, because a user can publish to several independent relays. Buzz is self-hostable, which removes the risk of deplatforming.
Why not use Nostr? Why come up with something else entirely that would be just a worse version of Nostr at best?
Jack Dorsey launches Buzz to combine team chat, AI agents and Git hosting
371–380 of 383 posts
Re: Jack Dorsey launches Buzz to combine team chat, AI agents and Git hosting
#372Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why not use Nostr? Why come up with something else entirely that would be just a worse version of Nostr at best?
Honestly: I don't get what the benefit of Nostr is for this use-case.
Later some actual advantages came to my mind, as I was writing this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49022183
Re: Jack Dorsey launches Buzz to combine team chat, AI agents and Git hosting
#373Re: Jack Dorsey launches Buzz to combine team chat, AI agents and Git hosting
#374Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are right, and "decentralized" would be the proper word. Thats why it is often associated with Bitcoin (and yes, because there are extensions that allow you to "zap" - i.e. attach bitcoin via lightning network to messages. These are optional extensions however, and Nostr serves its own right outside of crypto. In the times of internet censorship and social media ID verification, Nostr is a welcome technology.
Lightning network is a vaporware scam that has never and will never work. It's purpose was to convince idiots that Bitcoin hadn't been taken over when it actually had been by the private company, Blockstream.
Re: Jack Dorsey launches Buzz to combine team chat, AI agents and Git hosting
#375That screenshot is some Lynchian horror. "#engineering. New direction, team – we're moving the prototype to Flutter" and then the humans and agent bots engage in flirty emoji-filled chats with cutesy names "I nailed the physics, UI shell @Honeybot?" I'm trying to imagine a world in which this makes sense as a way to organize software development work, but coming up short. It's on a blockchain or something though, so…
Maybe it's just me, but when I was younger one reason that got me into AI research was the idea that one day we would have these seemingly intelligent entities that we could talk to and interact with just like we do with humans. Now that we have that, everybody hates it. Except me. I still like this. There might still be room for improvement, yes, but I think this is a cool attempt to making AI agents part of the tea…
To me, it seems like a loud online minority, and it's mostly entangled with politics or job security.
Most good programmers I know are using it effectively and like it.
Re: Jack Dorsey launches Buzz to combine team chat, AI agents and Git hosting
#376Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe it's just me, but when I was younger one reason that got me into AI research was the idea that one day we would have these seemingly intelligent entities that we could talk to and interact with just like we do with humans. Now that we have that, everybody hates it. Except me. I still like this. There might still be room for improvement, yes, but I think this is a cool attempt to making AI agents part of the tea…
I've been at my current company for just over three years. I manage a small team of developers at a medium-sized consultancy, building internal tooling for our data analysts. One of my junior developers started the same day I did; we went through on boarding together. He's in his mid 20s, this is his second job post-college, after having an abysmal experience entering the workforce during COVID. He's had some struggl…
Where does the money come from that was used for those houses? From you? Oh, that's great, then keep handing out housefuls of money to people in your life that you appreciate. What? It was from someone else? Why did that someone else hand over that money? Because of "service of people"? Did they say so?
Re: Jack Dorsey launches Buzz to combine team chat, AI agents and Git hosting
#377Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe it's just me, but when I was younger one reason that got me into AI research was the idea that one day we would have these seemingly intelligent entities that we could talk to and interact with just like we do with humans. Now that we have that, everybody hates it. Except me. I still like this. There might still be room for improvement, yes, but I think this is a cool attempt to making AI agents part of the tea…
I get it. I am still in love with the idea of having little bot and helper I can interact with. Realistic NPC, etc ... I think my current distrust and disappointment as many reasons that mostly boils down to imagination vs. reality. The current generation of LLM takes a lot of resources to make, so of course it was made and pushed by the worst offender of late-stage capitalism. Giving an air of mercantilism, corporat…
Re: Jack Dorsey launches Buzz to combine team chat, AI agents and Git hosting
#378Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe it's just me, but when I was younger one reason that got me into AI research was the idea that one day we would have these seemingly intelligent entities that we could talk to and interact with just like we do with humans. Now that we have that, everybody hates it. Except me. I still like this. There might still be room for improvement, yes, but I think this is a cool attempt to making AI agents part of the tea…
> Now that we have that, everybody hates it. To me, it seems like a loud online minority, and it's mostly entangled with politics or job security. Most good programmers I know are using it effectively and like it.
The anthropomorophization and cutesiness of this example really sucks to me. I want my AI to be a cold and emotionless tool for making an income in a dying miserable world.
Re: Jack Dorsey launches Buzz to combine team chat, AI agents and Git hosting
#379Hi, folks There's a brief write-up on Buzz here https://engineering.block.xyz/blog/buzz
Re: Jack Dorsey launches Buzz to combine team chat, AI agents and Git hosting
#380Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think a happy medium like signal would be much better, slack is an immovable part of much of the (white-collar) business relationship world now but it'd be nice if there were assurances of secrecy and security in communication as 24/7 cyberattacks rather than a company whose security is based solely on promises rather than zero-knowledge systems. Signal has had far and away the best cross-platform messaging experie…
But why would a business want to have it's internal communications be on a platform like signal? none of the privacy features feel relevant to work related communications, if anything I think a company needs the ability to see all communications on platforms it uses for audit ability, collaboration, etc