Live data from Hacker News

DARPA, U.S. Air Force fly AI-controlled F-16

darpa.mil

21–30 of 357 posts

Re: DARPA, U.S. Air Force fly AI-controlled F-16

#21
post #3

Sounds like a very expensive drone

More like it'll fly itself while the pilot engages in other tasks. Every pound of weapons officer/navigator is a pound you can't put on target all else being equal.

Does the presence of humans on board limit the maneuverability of these aircraft in any way? E.g. in terms of acceleration?

Re: DARPA, U.S. Air Force fly AI-controlled F-16

#22
> The kit utilizes a novel interface with the aircraft’s flight controls and mission systems, allowing a pilot to toggle between traditional human control and AI control with the flip of a switch. This ensures a safe, reliable environment for human-on-the-loop experimentation.

How, exactly, does that ensure a safe reliable environment? Humans are pretty bad at suddenly taking over when an automatic system reaches its limits and throws a problem in the human's lap. A lot of air upsets and crashes start when the autopilot disengages and hands control of a badly configured aircraft back to a human pilot.

Re: DARPA, U.S. Air Force fly AI-controlled F-16

#25

All Stealth bombers are upgraded with Cyberdyne computers, becoming fully unmanned. Afterwards they fly with a perfect operational record. The Skynet funding bill is passed. The system goes on-line on August 4, 1997. Human decisions are removed from strategic defense. Skynet begins to learn at a geometric rate. It becomes self-aware at 2:14 a.m. Eastern time, August 29. In a panic, they try to pull the plug.

Ha - this was the first thing that came to mind. I read this in Arnold's voice.

I didn't read it in Arnold's voice till I saw your comment, so thank you.

Re: DARPA, U.S. Air Force fly AI-controlled F-16

#26
post #3

Sounds like a very expensive drone

More like it'll fly itself while the pilot engages in other tasks. Every pound of weapons officer/navigator is a pound you can't put on target all else being equal.

"I apologize, that was indeed a wedding party, not a terrorist camp I wrongly assumed. You are totally right, wasting those 3 Hydras was unacceptable. On a brighter side, we've got 39 more to go!

Should I seek another target looking similar to the one I unintentionally destroyed so as to tune my decision-making, or give you an advice on how to wipe the traces of this mishap from the mission data recorder?"

Re: DARPA, U.S. Air Force fly AI-controlled F-16

#29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

More like it'll fly itself while the pilot engages in other tasks. Every pound of weapons officer/navigator is a pound you can't put on target all else being equal.

Does the presence of humans on board limit the maneuverability of these aircraft in any way? E.g. in terms of acceleration?

Yes. Humans can survive 9g for only a few seconds, while a drone could do much sharper manouvers

Re: DARPA, U.S. Air Force fly AI-controlled F-16

#30

A computer can never be held accountable Therefore a computer must make all unpopular management decisions

This whole AI hype is such a convenient cover for the decisions of the 0.001%

It really is. It's the perfect excuse to do what they please.
Post reply on HN