Live data from Hacker News

OpenAI and Anthropic unite against open-weight AI risks to their bottom line

axios.com

41–50 of 359 posts

Re: OpenAI and Anthropic unite against open-weight AI risks to their bottom line

#46

And to think I got warned in another post that I need to be nicer/more professional in discussing this topic. Yeah. Nah. Bringing out the same drum I’ve been banging for years now , these companies have never actually cared about ensuring safe AI, regulation, or ensuring it benefits all humanity. It has always, always , been about control and their profit margins. Their actions have never reflected any sort of positi…

Anyone who thinks these companies ever cared about any of that is naive.

Re: OpenAI and Anthropic unite against open-weight AI risks to their bottom line

#47
It's inevitable. The value proposition of the software isn't large enough to justify (by itself) the valuation. Not to mention it's trained on lots of public or scraped data.

It's a gold rush, and the only guy getting rich will be the one selling the shovel (nvidia + cloud in this case).

Re: OpenAI and Anthropic unite against open-weight AI risks to their bottom line

#48
Regulation won't beat engineering here. China will continue to release open weight models that are impossible to ban without unprecedented surveillance in Western countries.

AI labs need to innovate if they want to win. Open models are capitalism. Ideally Western companies should get more efficient, but if we can't then we should be doing the opposite of regulation, and subsidizing western models.

Re: OpenAI and Anthropic unite against open-weight AI risks to their bottom line

#49
More and more I'm getting the feeling that I should drop my Claude account and fully move to Chinese providers. This is sickening, especially with every mention being about "the US evaluating" aka controlling. Meanwhile us in the rest of the world can only look on and hope cracks remain for us to benefit.

Re: OpenAI and Anthropic unite against open-weight AI risks to their bottom line

#50
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would rather we not lose the AI race so idiotically. Winning the AI race means letting OpenAI and Anthropic face market forces. Edit: Clearly other companies are doing well. ElevenLabs, Runway, FAL, RunPod, CoreWeave, Lambda, BaseTen, Lovable. These are real companies that didn't raise absurd amounts of capital. They've grown revenues at a solid clip, provide real value, and didn't go off the deep end with fundrais…

How are we winning? Nobody has actually created a business model that works yet. Just because you can hemorrhage hundreds of billions of dollars to build the most performant model doesn't necessarily mean you're going to make your money back.

Have you actually looked at the current financials?
Post reply on HN