Live data from Hacker News

LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps

krebsonsecurity.com

471–480 of 549 posts

Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps

#474
post #451
post #399

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Some people do run Tailscale proxies in their home, and an always-on device like a TV is a good place to run it.

Why would your TV always be on? My TV is only on when I'm using it.

[flagged]

Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps

#476

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not "quasi-malware," it is malware.

My understanding of malware is that it must cause some problem for the user.

Slowing down your internet connection due to using your bandwidth without your knowledge, getting blocked by websites due to malicious traffic from your IP address, extra annoying captchas due to the same. Those were just the first 3 things off the top of my head.

Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps

#477

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In a hypothetical world where using TLS was abnormal, you could monitor the content of whatever the bots are doing for suspicious activity. And if they chose to use TLS anyway, the mere presence of of TLS could be considered suspicious. Back in the real world, you can also passively fingerprint TLS handshakes to characterise the client device. Most of these proxy networks masquerade as "normal" clients, but if the ty…

It's not a crime to buy a new device and log it in to your WiFi.

Of course not, but if someone buys 1000 new devices and rotates devices with each request, it might be worth sending them an email like "hey did you mean to be doing that?"

Re: LG to ban residential proxies from smart TV apps

#479

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My understanding of malware is that it must cause some problem for the user.

Slowing down your internet connection due to using your bandwidth without your knowledge, getting blocked by websites due to malicious traffic from your IP address, extra annoying captchas due to the same. Those were just the first 3 things off the top of my head.

Got plenty of bandwidth, sites block you regardless, you get captchas regardless. Plus, IP addresses rotate once a day so you're just as likely to get someone else's bad reputation anyway.

To sue them you'd have to show some actual, concrete harm. For example you contact a site that is blocking you and they tell you it's due to a certain request and you trace that request to the proxy.

Post reply on HN