Live data from Hacker News

So Reddit has decided that plain HTML is unsafe

cole-k.com

351–360 of 681 posts

Re: So Reddit has decided that plain HTML is unsafe

#351

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Literally yesterday I started getting a login wall for old.reddit. Not sure the targeting rules on this (it’s been sporadic across sessions/devices) but definitely on a mobile browser while on cellular data.

I've seen some weird behavior with it, as well. But I'm fine with it. I visit a single subreddit now and if they destroy the UX I'll only be happier for leaving.

They blocked old.reddit.com unless you are logged in on Monday. I don't have an account on there anymore so that effectively blocks me from the entire platform. Oh well.

Re: So Reddit has decided that plain HTML is unsafe

#352

I refuse to log in to Reddit, deleted my account ages ago. And now on mobile it places an unclosable pop-over asking me to log in to continue reading. So now I only read things on desktop. Would like to stop using Reddit all together but sometimes it is genuinely useful to read some human answers, although since LLM’s train on the data I can get a lot of the same info that way at least.

I would really just like to stop receiving bot spam because they allow arbitrary uses to "sign in" with your email without any validation.

To which you then receive login codes via email and recommendations to Russian subreddits

Re: So Reddit has decided that plain HTML is unsafe

#354

I refuse to log in to Reddit, deleted my account ages ago. And now on mobile it places an unclosable pop-over asking me to log in to continue reading. So now I only read things on desktop. Would like to stop using Reddit all together but sometimes it is genuinely useful to read some human answers, although since LLM’s train on the data I can get a lot of the same info that way at least.

old.reddit.com works to bypass that on mobile.

Re: So Reddit has decided that plain HTML is unsafe

#355

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Have you ever looked at an old reddit comment thread. + Hey how do you do thing? | -+ [deleted] | -+ Thanks, that's just what I needed.

Reddit will delete anything remotely controversial if it contains referenced facts. They banned and deleted my account for simply stating the 5th amendment prohibits requiring incriminating yourself to exercise a right. An Ivy League educated lawyer dug up the comment one year after I posted it, told reddit I was distributing illegal legal advice, and had my whole account nuked.

My real name account got banned for quoting something someone else said. Pretty hilarious in hindsight.

Re: So Reddit has decided that plain HTML is unsafe

#356
post #274

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I think at this point I'm ready to give up on Reddit, most of my questions are already answered by LLM. That's a bizarre and self-sabotaging path to take. Almost all LLMs get a substantial portion of their knowledge from Reddit. In order to evaluate the quality of those LLM responses, you'll have to click through to the Reddit threads and critically evaluate the quality of the underlying discussions. If you just bl…

I agree with them. In many of the subs I used to frequent, the outrage is high and the signal is low. LLM really is the best way to consume the content there. Retrieve the new posts of the day/week, filter out the outrage and politics and low-effort Reddit in-jokes/copypasta, then summarize the various comment threads. My time is too valuable to sift through the utterly mind-numbing nonsense to get the occasional new…

To many bots on reddit, so your solution is to go directly to the bot!!?

If bots bury the signal in noise then an LLM is only going go back and give you the summary of the noise.

Re: So Reddit has decided that plain HTML is unsafe

#357

Earlier quoted context omitted.

UBlock Origin can clear those on FF mobile with one of the Annoyances lists

If you're on iOS, you're out of luck. FF extensions aren't supported.

Take a look at https://apps.apple.com/app/sink-it-for-reddit/id6449873635.

Re: So Reddit has decided that plain HTML is unsafe

#358

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> everyone jumped on the bandwagon Reddit has become the epitome of Idiocracy , but let's not pretend like spam-level shallow commenters sucking each other off hasn't infected this place too. I honestly think if we took voting away the dynamics of online discussion would reset to normal.

/. Actually did do that right. You voted on comments and had to judge other votes as to whether or not they were accurate. And limit the + or - to a maximum of 5. Then you don't have people chasing scores. Granted, the voting system was the only thing slashdot did right, but it was good.

/. Is the same 10 dudes arguing with each other all day long on every thread.

Re: So Reddit has decided that plain HTML is unsafe

#359

I refuse to log in to Reddit, deleted my account ages ago. And now on mobile it places an unclosable pop-over asking me to log in to continue reading. So now I only read things on desktop. Would like to stop using Reddit all together but sometimes it is genuinely useful to read some human answers, although since LLM’s train on the data I can get a lot of the same info that way at least.

Try "RedReader". You can use reddit without the account.

Re: So Reddit has decided that plain HTML is unsafe

#360

I refuse to log in to Reddit, deleted my account ages ago. And now on mobile it places an unclosable pop-over asking me to log in to continue reading. So now I only read things on desktop. Would like to stop using Reddit all together but sometimes it is genuinely useful to read some human answers, although since LLM’s train on the data I can get a lot of the same info that way at least.

old.reddit.com works to bypass that on mobile.

The article is literally about how they’re killing old.reddit.com unless you login.
Post reply on HN