Live data from Hacker News

John C. Dvorak has died

twitter.com

101–110 of 340 posts

Re: John C. Dvorak has died

#101
post #91
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He was often wrong.

How wonderful to be human, and to be able to have your own political views and opinions such that you could be, subjectively, wrong. We can all only hope to one day also have our own opinions and proudly be wrong.

so this cuts both ways. You voluntarily publish your "beliefs" widely and publicly, be prepared to be called on it. Most of us choose not to do this, but if you want to exert influence you are held inviting criticism.

Re: John C. Dvorak has died

#102
post #50
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Most of what I know him for was coming on TWiT, driving Leo Laporte nuts, and making claims that ended up not coming true. He was a hilarious curmudgeon. He will be missed.

He was a very readable columnist for PC Mag among other places. He was also more focused on being interesting and at least a bit provocative than being correct. >He was a hilarious curmudgeon. Agreed.

>> He was also more focused on being interesting and at least a bit provocative than being correct.

So exactly like everyone today, but also interesting?

Re: John C. Dvorak has died

#105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He was the creator of Cranky Geeks. One of the first podcasts I listened to.

[flagged]

I used to listen to No Agenda from episode 1 on. It literally was just John and Adam recording their regular phone calls, discussing dinners they had together, etc. Over time it became more and more of what I'd describe as a conspiracy podcast.

No Agenda, John and Adam will forever have a special place in my heart regardless of the show eventually putting me off. Adam was what first brought my attention to Second Life where I ended up randomly meeting my now wife. We ended up listening to early No Agenda during long car rides. During one of the episodes John and Adam talked about their visit to Chez Spencer near our home in SF. We checked it out and loved it and later had our wedding rehearsal dinner there. Thank you, John!

Re: John C. Dvorak has died

#106
post #91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How wonderful to be human, and to be able to have your own political views and opinions such that you could be, subjectively, wrong. We can all only hope to one day also have our own opinions and proudly be wrong.

so this cuts both ways. You voluntarily publish your "beliefs" widely and publicly, be prepared to be called on it. Most of us choose not to do this, but if you want to exert influence you are held inviting criticism.

You’ll note that the comment above was not “criticism” or argument of any meaningful kind.

It simply flagged that he was on the “wrong team”.

Re: John C. Dvorak has died

#107

I'm 36, I've been an intense podcast listener and tech news reader since I was 14 years old. In 2005, I discovered This Week in Tech where John C. Dvorak was a frequent early guest. I liked his style and found other podcasts and websites where I could find his content. I really enjoyed Cranky Geeks. For fans, here is the No Agenda newsletter link with current information: https://mailchi.mp/nashownotes/rip-jcd-no-age…

Wow, you’re my twin! I’d watch these on XBMC/Xbox Media Center with some other video podcasts - it was a magical moment in tech

Re: John C. Dvorak has died

#109

I'd say this def rates a black bar.

I could not agree more. You might love him, you might hate him. But he was a fixture in the Golden Age of Personal Computing.

He was definitely controversial, as evidenced by the rating on the grandfather post.

Re: John C. Dvorak has died

#110
post #89

I don't know the man personally, but I was never impressed by his punditry even in the early PC MAG days and it got even worse when he started writing for MarketWatch. He was always lots of loud platitudes or damnations with more noise than signal or thoughtful analysis. At some point, I just stopped listening and/or reading whenever his name came up.

Been racking my brain trying to understand what the purpose of this comment is. I'm not saying everyone MUST write something positive about the man, but I just have a hard time understanding what this comment in particular adds.

Been racking my brain trying to understand what the purpose of this comment is.

Some people just like to see themselves in phosphor, and were never taught not to speak ill of the dead. Etiquette is a lost art.

Post reply on HN